PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Journal of the American Chemical Society0 citations

Sulfite Is Not Required for N 2 Reduction Catalyzed by Mo-Nitrogenase

View Full Paper
ZYZhi-Yong YangDLDmitriy LukoyanovAPAna Pérez‐González

Key Points

  • To determine the requirement of sulfite for nitrogen reduction catalyzed by Mo-nitrogenase.
  • Conducted turnover studies of Mo-nitrogenase without sulfite using reduced viologen as reductant.
  • Utilized protein preparations free of dithionite and sulfite.
  • Performed EPR spectroscopic analyses to assess cofactor states after catalytic cycles.
  • Mo-nitrogenase efficiently catalyzed N2 and proton reduction without sulfite, with a turnover number exceeding 150.
  • The ratio of H2 formed to N2 reduced remained consistent regardless of the reductant used.
  • EPR analyses showed the FeMo-cofactor returned to its resting state after multiple cycles without sulfite.
  • Physiological growth of Azotobacter vinelandii was unaffected by the absence of sulfite.

Abstract

Mo-nitrogenase catalyzes the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to two ammonia (NH3) at the active-site FeMo-cofactor. Substrate activation requires the accumulation of three or four electrons and protons as two Fe-bound hydrides and is coupled to obligatory H2 release through reductive hydride elimination. Subsequent delivery of four or five additional electrons and protons to the bound N2 yields two NH3 molecules. Increasing evidence suggests that at least one belt sulfide within FeMo-cofactor is dynamically involved in the catalytic cycle. A recent report further proposed that sulfite (SO32-) is required for N2 reduction, with sulfite binding required for NH3 release and a subsequent six-electron reduction of the bound sulfite to regenerate the resting cofactor. To test this proposal, we conducted turnover studies of Mo-nitrogenase under sulfite-free conditions using a reduced viologen as reductant and protein preparations devoid of dithionite or sulfite. Under these conditions, nitrogenase effectively catalyzed both N2 reduction and proton reduction, exhibiting steady-state turnover under N2 for 6 min, with a turnover number exceeding 150, approaching that observed with dithionite as reductant. The same H2-formed/N2-reduced ratio was observed whether dithionite or the viologen species was used as reductant. Further, EPR spectroscopic analyses showed that the FeMo-cofactor returned to its resting state after multiple catalytic cycles in the absence of sulfite. Finally, physiological bypass of sulfite formation does not affect the capacity for diazotrophic growth of the model nitrogen-fixing organism Azotobacter vinelandii. These results demonstrate that sulfite is not required for Mo-nitrogenase-catalyzed N2 reduction either in vitro or in vivo.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47376010ef96374d8f40chttps://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6c04174
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper