PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract LB119: An integrated DNA methylation-based and multidimensional risk factor model for predicting breast cancer progression

View Full Paper
CHChin‐Sheng HungRLRuo-Kai Lin

Key Result

An integrated model combining methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 with patient factors significantly improved the prediction of breast cancer progression beyond conventional tumor markers alone.

Key Points

  • To create a blood-based prediction model that combines cancer-specific methylation biomarkers and patient-related risk factors for breast cancer progression monitoring.
  • Enrolled 200 breast cancer patients in a prospective cohort study.
  • Collected baseline demographic, lifestyle, and psychosocial data at enrollment.
  • Monitored blood samples for quantitative analysis of GCM2 and TMEM240 every three months.
  • Constructed a multivariable regression model incorporating biomarkers and patient factors.
  • Used disease-free survival as the primary outcome.
  • The integrated model showed that both DNA methylation biomarkers and patient-related factors influenced breast cancer progression risk.
  • Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and high BMI were linked to increased risk.
  • Reproductive factors like live births and breastfeeding duration correlated with varied risk profiles.
  • Poor sleep quality, psychosocial stress, and unhealthy dietary patterns were also contributing factors.
  • Methylation biomarkers GCM2 and TMEM240 enhanced predictive performance beyond traditional tumor markers.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=200)

Structured PICO

Does an integrated model combining DNA methylation biomarkers (GCM2 and TMEM240) and patient-related risk factors improve prediction of disease-free survival in breast cancer patients compared to conventional tumor markers?

P
Population
200 breast cancer patients in Taiwan
I
Intervention
Integrated multivariable model combining circulating DNA methylation biomarkers (GCM2 and TMEM240) with tumor characteristics and multidimensional patient-related risk factors
C
Comparator
Conventional tumor markers alone
O
Outcome
Disease-free survivalhard clinical

Combining circulating DNA methylation biomarkers (GCM2 and TMEM240) with multidimensional risk factors improves the prediction of breast cancer progression compared to conventional tumor markers.

Abstract

Abstract Background: Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with approximately 20-30% of patients with early-stage disease developing metastatic recurrence. Conventional serum tumor markers, such as CA15-3 and CEA, have limited sensitivity for monitoring disease progression. Circulating DNA methylation biomarkers offer a promising approach for dynamic assessment of tumor burden. This study aimed to develop an integrated blood-based prediction model combining cancer specific methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 with tumor characteristics and multidimensional patient-related risk factors to improve breast cancer progression monitoring. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 200 breast cancer patients in Taiwan were enrolled and followed for 6 to 65 months after diagnosis, with 87. 7% of patients followed for more than three years. Baseline demographic, anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, psychosocial, dietary, and lifestyle variables were systematically collected at enrollment. Blood samples were obtained every three months for quantitative methylation analysis of GCM2 and TMEM240, together with conventional tumor marker assessments. Disease-free survival was used as the primary outcome. A multivariable regression model integrating methylation biomarkers, tumor stage, breast cancer subtype, hormone receptor status, tumor markers, and patient-related risk factors was constructed to estimate individual breast cancer progression risk. Results: The integrated multivariable model demonstrated that both circulating DNA methylation biomarkers and patient-related factors independently and collectively contributed to breast cancer progression risk. Factors associated with increased risk included triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), elevated body mass index (BMI), and a first-degree family history of other malignancies. Reproductive and endogenous hormonal factors, including number of live births and exclusive breastfeeding for ≥ 6 months, were associated with differential risk profiles. In addition, persistent poor sleep quality without effective improvement strategies, psychosocial stress, and dietary patterns characterized by frequent intake of sweets or highly processed foods were identified as contributory risk factors. Incorporation of methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 significantly improved the predictive performance of the progression model beyond conventional tumor markers alone. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that combining circulating DNA methylation biomarkers (GCM2 and TMEM240) with tumor characteristics and multidimensional patient-related risk factors enables a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of breast cancer progression risk. Importantly, patients identified as higher risk for disease progression by the multivariable regression model may benefit from intensified surveillance, including serial blood-based methylation monitoring of GCM2 and TMEM240 at three-month intervals, to facilitate earlier detection of disease progression and more timely clinical intervention. This integrated approach shows strong potential for clinical utility in precision monitoring of treatment response and tumor burden, supporting further validation and translation into clinical practice. Citation Format: Chin-Sheng Hung, Ruo-Kai Lin. An integrated DNA methylation-based and multidimensional risk factor model for predicting breast cancer progression abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts) ; 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (8Suppl): Abstract nr LB119.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hung et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Breast cancer (n=200). Integrated prediction model (methylated GCM2 and TMEM240, tumor characteristics, patient risk factors) vs. Conventional tumor markers was evaluated on Disease-free survival. An integrated model combining methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 with patient factors significantly improved the prediction of breast cancer progression beyond conventional tumor markers alone.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473bd010ef96374d8f88bhttps://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb119
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Advancements in breast cancer progression monitoring: Analysis of methylated circulating cell- free DNA.2024
  2. 2PS4-05-27: Longitudinal multi-omic profiling of tissues and blood to track the molecular evolution of metastatic breast cancer2026
  3. 3Abstract PS2-07-05: Methylation-based ctDNA Dynamics as a Biomarker for Treatment Response and Prognosis in Patients on the plasmaMATCH trial2026
  4. 4Abstract 3458: DNA methylation-predicted blood protein levels and breast cancer risk2024
  5. 5Abstract 7834: DNA methylation: A highly accurate biomarker for treatment monitoring - A retrospective case study using cfDNA methylation and machine learning in breast cancer patients.2026