PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026European Journal of Ophthalmology2 citationsOpen Access

Optimizing topical glaucoma treatment outcomes: When less is better. A review on the clinical benefits of reducing treatment burden in glaucoma management

View Full Paper
RCRonald Marinus Petrus Cornelis de CromLPLuís Abegão PintoISIngeborg Stalmans

Key Points

  • The review aims to evaluate the benefits of reducing treatment burden in glaucoma management.
  • Reviewed current glaucoma management strategies
  • Analyzed the effectiveness of preservative-free formulations
  • Examined lower active ingredient concentrations and fixed combinations
  • Discussed barriers to implementation such as cost and data limitations
  • Treatment simplification improves patient adherence and tolerability
  • Minimizing ocular surface toxicity enhances clinical outcomes
  • Fixed combinations enhance ease of use while maintaining effectiveness
  • Patient-centered approaches may encourage sustainable management despite some barriers

Abstract

Glaucoma, a leading cause of irreversible blindness, is primarily managed by lowering intraocular pressure, yet treatment remains limited by poor adherence, ocular surface toxicity, and systemic adverse effects. This review focuses specifically on treatment simplification strategies in topical glaucoma therapy, exploring the paradigm shift towards a “Less is better” approach in glaucoma care, with particular emphasis on the use of preservative -free formulations, lower active ingredient concentrations, and fixed combinations. These approaches aim to improve treatment tolerability, adherence, and clinical outcomes while minimizing toxicity, complexity, and environmental burden. Although barriers such as higher costs and limited long-term data remain, this new approach represents a patient-centred, sustainable, and clinically effective model for the future of glaucoma management.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Crom et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473bd010ef96374d8f8b9https://doi.org/10.1177/11206721261438585
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper