PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026˜The œcryosphere0 citationsOpen Access

Evaluating snow depth measurements from ground-penetrating radar and airborne lidar in boreal forest and tundra environments during the NASA SnowEx 2023 campaign

KHKajsa Holland-GoonRBRandall BonnellDMDaniel McGrath

Key Points

  • To assess the accuracy of snow depth measurements from ground-penetrating radar and airborne lidar during the NASA SnowEx 2023 campaign.
  • Conducted measurements along 44 short transects (3–12 m) in tundra and boreal forest settings in Alaska.
  • Compared GPR and airborne lidar snow depth data to in situ observations.
  • Analyzed biases in snow depth retrievals related to environmental factors like vegetation and ground surface conditions.
  • GPR exhibited modest biases in snow depths: <0.03 m in tundra and +0.06 m in boreal forests.
  • Lidar showed larger biases, especially in the boreal forests, with a bias of −0.16 m.
  • Vertical alignment issues in the Arctic Coastal Plain lidar dataset contributed to increased bias.

Abstract

Abstract. Snow is a vital component of high-latitude terrestrial systems, but environmental factors (e.g., permafrost) and complex vegetation challenge the accurate measurement of key snowpack properties. We evaluated local-scale ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and large-scale airborne lidar retrievals of snow depth collected during the NASA SnowEx 2023 campaign in tundra and boreal forest environments in Alaska along 44 short (3–12 m) transects. Compared to in situ observations, we identified modest biases for GPR snow depths (bias <0.03 m in tundra, +0.06 m in boreal forests) and larger biases for lidar snow depths in the boreal forests (−0.16 m). At the Upper Kuparuk-Toolik tundra site, lidar snow depths exhibited a small bias (−0.02 m), whereas the bias was much larger at the Arctic Coastal Plain tundra site (+0.19 m). For most sites, biases were primarily related to sub-snow vegetation, tussocks, and seasonally dynamic ground. However, we identified vertical alignment issues with the Arctic Coastal Plain lidar snow depth dataset that likely contributed to the higher bias. The complex ground surface and sub-snow vegetation in these environments present a challenge to established snow depth measurement methods, which needs to be considered when evaluating novel remote sensing approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Holland-Goon et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473bd010ef96374d8f8bfhttps://doi.org/10.5194/tc-20-2169-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper