PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Cancer Research0 citations

Abstract LB233: Protein engineering of selective MMP-9 inhibitors reveals a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer

View Full Paper
ASAlireza ShoariAHAlexandra HocklaMCMatt Coban

Key Points

  • The aim is to engineer selective inhibitors for MMP-9 to treat triple-negative breast cancer while preserving MMP-8 function.
  • Engineered variants of TIMP-1 using yeast surface display library.
  • Screened using fluorescence-activated cell sorting for MMP-9 and counter-selected against MMP-8.
  • Evaluated binding and inhibitory selectivity of TIMP-1 variants in functional assays.
  • Identified TIMP-1-C6.2 with a Ki of 0.3 nM for MMP-9, showing 23-fold selectivity over MMP-8.
  • TIMP-1-C6.2 significantly inhibited invasion of MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells compared to wild-type TIMP-1 (p < 0.0001).
  • Improved anti-invasive activity attributed to refined target selectivity rather than broader inhibitory potency.

Abstract

Abstract Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are key regulators of tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis; however, clinical efforts to inhibit MMPs have largely failed due to a lack of selectivity and unintended suppression of protective family members. In triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), MMP-9 (gelatinase B) is strongly associated with tumor aggressiveness, extracellular matrix remodeling, and metastatic dissemination. In contrast, MMP-8 has been shown to exert anti-tumorigenic effects in breast cancer by limiting inflammation and suppressing metastasis. This functional divergence underscores the importance of selectively targeting MMP-9 while preserving MMP-8 activity as a rational therapeutic strategy in TNBC. To address this challenge, we engineered variants of the endogenous MMP inhibitor tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) with enhanced selectivity for MMP-9 over MMP-8. A yeast surface display library of human TIMP-1 was constructed and screened using fluorescence-activated cell sorting through iterative rounds of positive selection for recombinant MMP-9, followed by competitive counter-selection against MMP-8 to eliminate off-target binders. This strategy enabled enrichment of TIMP-1 variants with improved specificity for MMP-9 compared with wild-type TIMP-1. Several TIMP-1 variants exhibited enhanced binding and inhibitory selectivity toward MMP-9, with TIMP-1-C6. 2 emerging as the most promising candidate. TIMP-1-C6. 2 preferentially inhibited MMP-9 with a Ki of 0. 3 ± 0. 04 nM, while demonstrating substantially weaker inhibition of MMP-8 (Ki = 6. 8 ± 0. 27 nM), corresponding to an approximately 23-fold selectivity for MMP-9. Importantly, functional evaluation in Matrigel invasion assays using MDA-MB-231 TNBC cells revealed that TIMP-1-C6. 2 significantly enhanced inhibition of tumor cell invasion compared with wild-type TIMP-1 in a dose-dependent manner (p 0. 0001). This improved anti-invasive activity reflects refined target selectivity rather than a generalized increase in inhibitory potency. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that selective engineering of TIMP-based inhibitors can overcome a central limitation of MMP-targeted therapies by suppressing pro-tumorigenic MMP-9 while sparing anti-tumorigenic MMP-8. This work provides a strong foundation for the development of selective MMP-9 inhibitors with improved safety and therapeutic potential for TNBC and other MMP-driven cancers. Citation Format: Alireza Shoari, Alexandra Hockla, Mathew A. Coban, Ella E. Aitchison, Alexandra M. Dimesa, Evette S. Radisky. Protein engineering of selective MMP-9 inhibitors reveals a therapeutic strategy for triple-negative breast cancer abstract. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts) ; 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86 (8Suppl): Abstract nr LB233.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Shoari et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e473ff010ef96374d8fb82https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-lb233
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Abstract 1331 Engineering Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1) Variants with Improved Binding Selectivity toward Matrix Metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) as potential protein therapeutics2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2BPS2026 – Computational design of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) inhibitors as potential cancer therapeutics2026
  3. 3Therapeutic potential of inhibitors of gelatinases <scp>MMP</scp> ‐2 and <scp>MMP</scp> ‐9 for the treatment of breast cancer2025
  4. 4Integrative computational, synthetic, experimental evaluation of targeted inhibitors against matrix metalloproteinase-9: Toward precision modulation of proteolytic activity2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Abstract PS4-04-15: Mechanomedicine targeting of MT1-MMP in TNBC spheroids2026