PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Energies2 citationsOpen Access

EV-Centric Technical Virtual Power Plants in Active Distribution Networks: An Integrative Review of Physical Constraints, Bidding, and Control

View Full Paper
YZYouzhuo ZhengHZHengrong ZhangALAnjiang Liu

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the operational challenges and control mechanisms of EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants in Active Distribution Networks.
  • Systematic literature review focusing on coordinated control and multi-market bidding mechanisms for EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants.
  • Assessment of physical-economic bidirectional mapping considering nonlinear constraints and node voltage limits.
  • Evaluation of optimization techniques and AI approaches in control strategies to mitigate battery degradation.
  • Identified trade-offs between aggregation fidelity, market complexity, and communication latency.
  • Outlined pathways for future engineering demonstrations and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) applications.
  • Synthesis of literature on coordinated participation in carbon trading and ancillary services.

Abstract

The accelerated low-carbon transition of power systems and the widespread integration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) present both severe operational challenges and substantial flexible regulation potential for Active Distribution Networks (ADNs). This paper provides an integrative review of the coordinated control and multi-market bidding mechanisms for EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants (TVPPs). Moving beyond descriptive surveys, this review systematically synthesizes the fragmented literature across three critical dimensions: (1) the physical-economic bidirectional mapping, which considers nonlinear power flow constraints and node voltage limits within the TVPP framework; (2) multi-market coupling mechanisms, evolving from unilateral energy bidding to coordinated participation in carbon trading and ancillary services; and (3) real-time control strategies, critically evaluating the trade-offs between optimization techniques (e.g., Model Predictive Control) and cutting-edge artificial intelligence approaches (e.g., Deep Reinforcement Learning) in mitigating battery degradation. Furthermore, a transparent review methodology is adopted to ensure literature rigor. By explicitly outlining the boundaries between TVPPs, Commercial VPPs (CVPPs), and EV aggregators, this paper identifies core unresolved trade-offs among aggregation fidelity, market complexity, and communication latency, providing evidence-backed pathways for future engineering demonstrations and V2G applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47440010ef96374d90039https://doi.org/10.3390/en19081945
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Optimizing smart microgrid performance: Integrating solar generation and static VAR compensator for EV charging impact, emphasizing SCOPE index2024 · 35 citations
  2. 2Long-time scale vehicle-to-grid scheduling strategy considering psychological effect based on Weber-Fechner law2021 · 20 citations
  3. 3A Privacy-Preserving Secure Framework for Electric Vehicles in IoT Using Matching Market and Signcryption2020 · 57 citations
  4. 4A Wasserstein‐distance‐based distributionally robust chance constrained bidding model for virtual power plant considering electricity‐carbon trading2023 · 26 citations
  5. 5Performance-based virtual power plant offering strategy incorporating hybrid uncertainty modeling and risk viewpoint2021 · 17 citations