PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026Energies3 citationsOpen Access

EV-Centric Technical Virtual Power Plants in Active Distribution Networks: An Integrative Review of Physical Constraints, Bidding, and Control

View Full Paper
YZYouzhuo ZhengHZHengrong ZhangALAnjiang Liu

Key Points

  • This review aims to evaluate the operational challenges and control mechanisms of EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants in Active Distribution Networks.
  • Systematic literature review focusing on coordinated control and multi-market bidding mechanisms for EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants.
  • Assessment of physical-economic bidirectional mapping considering nonlinear constraints and node voltage limits.
  • Evaluation of optimization techniques and AI approaches in control strategies to mitigate battery degradation.
  • Identified trade-offs between aggregation fidelity, market complexity, and communication latency.
  • Outlined pathways for future engineering demonstrations and Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) applications.
  • Synthesis of literature on coordinated participation in carbon trading and ancillary services.

Abstract

The accelerated low-carbon transition of power systems and the widespread integration of Electric Vehicles (EVs) present both severe operational challenges and substantial flexible regulation potential for Active Distribution Networks (ADNs). This paper provides an integrative review of the coordinated control and multi-market bidding mechanisms for EV-centric Technical Virtual Power Plants (TVPPs). Moving beyond descriptive surveys, this review systematically synthesizes the fragmented literature across three critical dimensions: (1) the physical-economic bidirectional mapping, which considers nonlinear power flow constraints and node voltage limits within the TVPP framework; (2) multi-market coupling mechanisms, evolving from unilateral energy bidding to coordinated participation in carbon trading and ancillary services; and (3) real-time control strategies, critically evaluating the trade-offs between optimization techniques (e.g., Model Predictive Control) and cutting-edge artificial intelligence approaches (e.g., Deep Reinforcement Learning) in mitigating battery degradation. Furthermore, a transparent review methodology is adopted to ensure literature rigor. By explicitly outlining the boundaries between TVPPs, Commercial VPPs (CVPPs), and EV aggregators, this paper identifies core unresolved trade-offs among aggregation fidelity, market complexity, and communication latency, providing evidence-backed pathways for future engineering demonstrations and V2G applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e47440010ef96374d90039https://doi.org/10.3390/en19081945
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Impact of public and residential smart EV charging on distribution power grid equipped with storage2024 · 58 citations
  2. 2Virtual power plant containing electric vehicles scheduling strategies based on deep reinforcement learning2021 · 89 citations
  3. 3A V2G strategy to increase the cost–benefit of primary frequency regulation considering EV battery degradation2020 · 8 citations
  4. 4Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning strategy for distributed energy2021 · 16 citations
  5. 5Optimal scheduling of solar powered EV charging stations in a radial distribution system using opposition-based competitive swarm optimization2025 · 51 citations