Response and Failure of Pillar–Backfill Composite Materials Under Cyclic Loading: The Role of Pillar Width

In the deep mining of metal mines, the stability of pillar–backfill composite materials (PBCMs) under cyclic loading is crucial for preventing dynamic disasters in goafs. Although previous studies have extensively investigated backfill materials under static loading, the damage evolution mechanism of PBCM under cyclic disturbance—particularly the coupled effects of pillar width and disturbance amplitude—remains insufficiently understood. To address this gap, this study explored the mechanical properties and damage evolution of PBCM under cyclic loading using an indoor testing system. Tests were conducted on composite specimens with varying pillar widths (6, 9, 12, 15 mm) and disturbance amplitudes (3, 4, 5 MPa), combined with acoustic emission (AE), digital image correlation (DIC), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results show that wide-pillar specimens (≥12 mm) exhibit significantly improved bearing strength and deformation modulus, with increases of nearly 90% and over 40%, respectively, compared to narrow-pillar specimens. Notably, wide pillars maintain over 95% strength stability even under 5 MPa cyclic disturbances. Narrow pillars are prone to localized damage concentration with high-frequency AE signals and shear failure, while wide pillars exhibit uniform damage development. Failure morphology confirms that pillar size dictates failure mode: narrow pillars undergo sudden through failure, whereas wide pillars display progressive composite failure, with fewer damage-induced cavities and directional crack propagation along maximum shear stress. These findings provide a theoretical basis for stope structure optimization and dynamic disaster prevention in deep mines.