PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Why the Consciousness Variable: The Limits and Reopening of Modern Science

View Full Paper
JLJINHO LEE

Key Points

  • The aim is to introduce the consciousness variable as a means to address unresolved issues in modern science.
  • Analyzing boundary problems in modern science such as entropy and quantum observation.
  • Discussing the concept of consciousness as a primary variable in scientific discourse.
  • Proposing a framework for reconfiguring complex system issues in light of consciousness.
  • Identified consciousness as a critical axis in understanding unresolved scientific phenomena.
  • Argued that science has not failed but reached a saturation point in its current framework.
  • Suggested a practical dashboard for navigating human and technological progress in relation to consciousness.

Abstract

Modern science has achieved extraordinary explanatory power with respect to the universe, matter, life, information, and computation. Yet when it reaches several decisive boundary problems, it repeatedly arrives at points where explanation appears to terminate. The origin of the universe, the directionality of time, the ground of conservation laws, the meaning of entropy, the problem of quantum observation, the emergence of subjective experience, and the recurring collapse of complex systems despite local optimization may be read not merely as signs of insufficient data, but as signs that the coordinate system itself has reached its limit. This paper proposes a name for that missing axis: the consciousness variable. Consciousness here is not treated as an auxiliary item added beside existing variables, but as the encompassing horizon within which contents and distinctions are disclosed. The paper argues that modern science has not failed; it has approached the saturation point of its present coordinate system. The introduction of the consciousness variable is therefore presented not as a rejection of science, but as a condition for reopening science. It allows unresolved problems such as the Big Bang, time, entropy, quantum observation, the hard problem of consciousness, and complex-system collapse to be reconfigured within a wider frame. The paper also argues that consciousness itself may not be fully capturable as an object within time and space, while still allowing the construction of honest interfaces capable of revealing directional signs of alignment and misalignment through consciousness-like signals. In that sense, what civilization now needs is not omniscient possession of consciousness, but a practical dashboard capable of discerning the direction in which human, technological, and social structures are moving. Official Project LinksSalpida Foundation:https://salpida.foundation/ GitHub:https://github.com/salpida-foundation/

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

JINHO LEE (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4745f010ef96374d90180https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19627019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper