PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026The Anatomical Record0 citations

Comparing pelvic dimensions of precocial and altricial Leporidae species to explore the idea of human “secondary altriciality”

View Full Paper
NLNatalie M. LaudicinaELEmma Long

Key Points

  • The aim is to investigate how pelvic morphology correlates with life history traits in precocial and altricial species.
  • Compared two Leporidae species: one precocial hare and one altricial rabbit.
  • Collected nine pelvic measurements from 24 adult specimens.
  • Analyzed pelvic dimensions while accounting for body size.
  • Pelvic dimensions significantly differed between the precocial hare and altricial rabbit.
  • The precocial hare exhibited larger pelvic dimensions in all but two measurements.

Abstract

Human infants exhibit a unique combination of precocial and altricial traits, often described as "secondarily altricial," reflecting their high dependency at birth despite belonging to a typically precocial primate lineage. One hypothesis posits that this altriciality evolved to alleviate obstetric constraints caused by bipedal locomotion and large brain size. To test whether pelvic morphology corresponds to life history patterns, this study examines pelvic dimensions in two species within the Family Leporidae: one hare (precocial) and one rabbit (altricial), which share similar relative brain sizes and locomotor patterns, minimizing confounding variables. Nine pelvic measurements were collected from 24 adult specimens. Accounting for body size, analyses revealed that pelvic dimensions significantly differed between the altricial and precocial species. The precocial hare exhibited significantly larger pelvic dimensions in all but two measures compared to the altricial rabbit. These findings support the hypothesis that pelvic morphology can adapt to differences in life history patterns, with expanded dimensions in precocial species helping to ease parturition of more developed offspring. This suggests that secondary altriciality in humans may reflect an evolutionary compromise between developmental maturity and constraints of the bipedal pelvis. Further research on additional taxa is needed to evaluate these trends and their implications for understanding human birth evolution.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Laudicina et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4745f010ef96374d90228https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.70208
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Altricial and precocial neonates and the secondary altriciality of human babies: the legacy of Adolf Portmann2026
  2. 2Testing the Energetics of Gestation and Growth Hypothesis for Human Secondary Altriciality2026 · 1 citations
  3. 3Comparative primate analysis shows that humans are not unique in having a tight cephalopelvic fit at birth2026
  4. 4Humans are not unique in having difficult births: A comparative primate analysis2025
  5. 5Evolutionary increases in body size are linked to female pelvis evolution in response to habitat rather than reproduction2025