PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 19, 2026The Journal of Physical Chemistry C0 citations

Probing Acidity in Metal–Organic Frameworks via Pyridine Adsorption

View Full Paper
MPMateusz PokoraJGJakub GoclonJMJohannes T. Margraf

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the acidity in metal-organic frameworks using pyridine as a probe molecule.
  • Utilized semilocal density functional theory (DFT) and semiemprical GFN1/GFN2-xTB methods.
  • Investigated pyridine adsorption on Lewis and Bronsted acid sites in ten different MOF structures.
  • Compared geometric and energetic parameters from GFN1/GFN2-xTB with DFT calculations.
  • GFN1-xTB is identified as a low-cost substitute for DFT but has predictive limitations.
  • GFN2-xTB outperforms GFN1-xTB, while DFTB/3ob methods yield better accuracy.
  • Adhesion energies and interaction types were characterized through Density Overlap Region Indicator (DORI) analysis.

Abstract

Semilocal density functional theory (DFT) and semiemprical GFN1/GFN2-xTB, as well as selected DFTB/3ob calculations, were performed to examine acidity in metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) using pyridine (Py) as a probe molecule. We studied Py adsorption on both Lewis and Bro̷nsted acid sites in ten distinct MOF structures. Our study provides detailed insight into their structures, thermodynamic properties, and vibrational spectra in selected ranges. All geometrical and energetic parameters obtained at the GFN1/GFN2-xTB levels were compared with those calculated using DFT. The results suggest that GFN1-xTB can only be used as a low-cost substitute for DFT for some systems. The adsorption energy prediction usually leads to unsatisfactory findings. GFN2-xTB and DFTB/3ob perform better than GFN1-xTB. Importantly, we identified areas where the GFN1/GFN2-xTB methods could be improved to yield more accurate results. By analyzing the density overlap region indicator (DORI) versus the adsorption energies, we revealed the nature and type of interactions in Py@MOFs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pokora et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e4745f010ef96374d90247https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5c08574
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper