PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026Open Research Europe1 citationsOpen Access

Optimizing direct-modulated laser LiFi systems for hospital environments through simulation-driven analysis of BER, SNR, and Q-factor performance

View Full Paper
ASAjay SharmaLGLalit GargPXPeter A. Xuereb

Key Points

  • This research aims to optimize Direct-Modulated Laser Light Fidelity (LiFi) systems for efficient communication in hospital settings.
  • Simulation-driven analysis of four parameters affecting LiFi performance
  • Evaluation of Bit Error Rate (BER), Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR), and Q-factor
  • Optimization of launch powers, modulation indices, beam divergences, and receiver apertures
  • Achieved BER well below 10^-9, indicating high reliability
  • SNR approximately 74.94 dB, demonstrating strong signal integrity
  • Q-factor of approximately 18.84 at 25 m, suggesting effective performance in ideal conditions

Abstract

Background Modern hospital environments require wireless communication systems that ensure electromagnetic interference (EMI) compliance, privacy, and high throughput for mission-critical applications, such as telemetry, medical imaging, and Electronic Health Record (EHR) synchronization. Traditional RF-based wireless systems are susceptible to EMI, limited spectrum availability, and security issues. Direct-Modulated Laser (DML)-based Light Fidelity (LiFi) offers a promising alternative by leveraging the visible spectrum for high-speed, interference-free communication in terms of intended optical emissions. Methods The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the commonly cited analytical reliability benchmark ( BER SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, under idealized detector-noise-limited assumptions. Launch powers ≥ +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8–1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1–2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4–6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Results The optimized configuration achieves BER well below the analytical benchmark ( BER −9 ), SNR ≈ 74.94 dB, and Q ≈ 18.84 at 25 m, demonstrating a substantial analytical performance margin in a best-case, well-aligned line-of-sight configuration. Launch powers = +5 dBm are required beyond ~15 m, modulation indices of 0.8–1.0 yield higher Q across distances, narrow beam divergences (1–2 mrad) maintain stronger SNR, and receiver apertures of 4–6 mm provide a balance between light collection and noise. Conclusions This paper introduces a four-parameter DML-LiFi optimization framework tailored to hospital environments, which offers a theoretical explanation of link-budget feasibility and parameter sensitivity to idealized indoor environment. These results indicate an upper-bound performance study, and not a demonstration of deployment-ready reliability, and are meant to be used in future experimental and system-level studies that focus on mobility, line-of-sight blockage, ambient-light-induced shot noise, electromagnetic interference pickup, and eye-safety constraints in hospital settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sharma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e713b4cb99343efc98d1a9https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.21605.3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper