PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026TURKISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES0 citationsOpen Access

The importance of early intraoperative ultrasonography and the relationship between surgical technique and allograft function in patients with compartment syndrome following renal transplantation surgery

BYBurak YağdıranEKEmre KarakayaRARavana Ahmadli

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the role of early Doppler ultrasonography in recognizing renal allograft compartment syndrome and its outcomes.
  • Retrospective examination of 275 patients undergoing renal transplantation.
  • Group comparison based on surgical technique: muscle and fascia closure versus skin-only closure.
  • Assessment of renal function through urine output and vascular parameters post-surgery.
  • 10.18% of RACS patients underwent permanent fasciotomy and skin-only closure.
  • No significant difference in mean urine output between closure techniques on postoperative days.
  • Doppler ultrasonography is crucial for diagnosing graft dysfunction in patients with suspected RACS.

Abstract

Background/aim: In rare cases, patients undergoing renal transplantation (RT) may develop renal allograft compartment syndrome (RACS) if the renal volume is larger than the retroperitoneal space prepared in the iliac fossa. In such cases, the optimal treatment is early decompression surgery. The primary aim of the present descriptive and comparative study is not to identify the optimal surgical technique, but rather to evaluate the role of early Doppler ultrasonography (DUSG) in the recognition of renal allograft compartment syndrome and to assess outcomes following timely decompressive interventions. Materials and methods: A total of 275 patients were examined retrospectively for the study, including 247 with muscle and fascia closure and 28 with skin-only closure. Results: Only 28 (10.18%) of the patients with RACS underwent permanent fasciotomy and skin-only closure. No statistically significant difference was observed in the mean urine output between the two groups on any postoperative day, assessed based on the renal artery resistive index and peak systolic velocity. Conclusion: RACS should be considered in patients with large-sized allografts and small parailiac retroperitoneal spaces to address the inherent anatomical restrictions. Although early diagnosis with DUSG is essential for evaluating graft dysfunction in these patients, early decompression surgery should be considered crucial for the preservation of graft function in those with suspected RACS.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yağdıran et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e71467cb99343efc98db3chttps://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.6180
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1ULTRASOUND DIAGNOSIS OF THE RENAL ARTERY STENOSIS IN A TRANSPLANTED KIDNEY IN THE EARLY POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD2024
  2. 2Intraoperative Doppler Verification of Arterial Occlusion in Minimally Invasive Renal Resection2026
  3. 3Intra‐operative duplex ultrasound scanning in renal transplantation: protocol and service requirements2024 · 3 citations
  4. 4Perioperative Kidney Transplant Care: A Narrative Review of Preoperative Optimization, Intraoperative Management, and Early Postoperative Allograft Surveillance2026
  5. 5THE IMPORTANCE OF ULTRASOUND EXAMINATION OF RENAL ALLOGRAFT2024