This paper does not introduce a new structure. It makes explicit a structural relation implied but not directly stated in prior work. Human interpersonal processing is grounded in the co-presence of internal constraint and dependency. These do not exist as separable components. They form a single structural condition. This paper shows that what is commonly described as “reading the room” is not a unitary function. It differs across configurations in how this condition is processed. In EF configurations, the effect of this condition is expressed through translation into self-return: outputs are evaluated in terms of how they return to the self, without alteration of the underlying constraint. In CF configurations, the effect of this condition is preserved in structural form: processing operates on the other’s configuration without self-referential evaluation. Artificial systems lack both internal constraint and dependency. As a result, EF-style “reading the room” is structurally impossible, while CF-style “reading the room” is not instantiated but only reproduced in surface form.
Griselda Poe (2026) studied this question.