PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Russian Journal of Nondestructive Testing0 citations

Dynamic Modeling of Dry-Coupled Ultrasonic Testing: Time-Varying Contact Stiffness and Experimental Validation

View Full Paper
WWWeichen WangWSWang ShaofengWLWenjing Liu

Key Points

  • The research aims to create a dynamic model for dry-coupled ultrasonic testing that addresses fluctuating interface conditions.
  • Developed a dynamic dry-coupling model using classical acoustic reflection principles.
  • Employed finite element simulations to derive an empirical scaling factor.
  • Validated the model experimentally on a robotic ultrasonic testing platform.
  • Demonstrated periodic modulation of reflection amplitudes consistent with theoretical predictions.
  • Achieved discrepancies within ±10% between experimental and theoretical results.
  • Established a predictive framework for assessing coupling quality in practical inspections.

Abstract

Ultrasonic nondestructive testing (NDT) is an essential technique for evaluating structural integrity, but its conventional reliance on liquid couplants limits applicability in harsh or field environments. Although dry coupling offers a more practical alternative, static models are insufficient to describe the fluctuating interface conditions encountered during scanning inspections. To address this limitation, we develop a dynamic dry-coupling model that incorporates time-varying contact stiffness, linking applied pressure, surface roughness, and material properties within the classical acoustic reflection framework. Finite element simulations using COMSOL Multiphysics were employed to determine the empirical scaling factor α, ensuring that the formulation remained physically consistent while avoiding arbitrary parameter fitting. Experimental validation was performed on a robotic ultrasonic testing platform equipped with a 5 MHz dual-element probe and a stepped 1018 steel block prepared with multiple surface roughness levels. By systematically varying scanning speed, contact pressure, and interface roughness, a comprehensive set of dynamic ultrasonic data was obtained. The results demonstrated clear periodic modulation of reflection amplitudes consistent with theoretical predictions, with discrepancies generally within ±10%. Collectively, these findings establish a robust and predictive framework for modeling ultrasonic reflection under dry-coupled conditions, providing a reliable basis for evaluating coupling quality in practical inspection scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e864c46e0dea528dde96cchttps://doi.org/10.1134/s1061830925605616
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper