This paper explores the dynamics of legal convergence and divergence in e-commerce contract laws, with a comparative focus on the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and the United Kingdom (UK). While the UAE, grounded in its civil law tradition, prioritizes arbitration and mediation for dispute resolution, the UK, guided by its common law roots, advances Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) platforms. These differences reflect broader socio-economic, cultural, and legal influences unique to each jurisdiction. By drawing on a detailed comparative analysis of legal frameworks, case law, and regulatory practices, this paper aims to identify actionable steps to harmonize crossborder dispute mechanisms. Ultimately, the study proposes pathways for fostering international cooperation and aligning with global standards, thereby advancing trust and innovation in digital commerce.
Nashat Mahmoud Jaradt (2026) studied this question.