PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Algorithms1 citationsOpen Access

Strategic Capacity Planning Algorithm for Last-Mile Delivery Under High-Volume Demand Surges

View Full Paper
DYDidar YedilkhanASAidarbek ShalakhmetovBMBakbergen Mendaliyev

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a fast planning algorithm for managing courier capacity during abrupt demand surges.
  • Proposed a hierarchical decomposition pipeline for efficient shift planning.
  • Utilized travel-time-based estimates to create shift-feasible clusters.
  • Employed dynamic programming and microclustering techniques for optimization.
  • Achieved planning speeds 187 to 1315 times faster than traditional matrix-based approaches.
  • Provided a conservative upper bound on courier shifts under strict shift-duration limits.
  • Enhanced feasibility-first planning compared to traditional route-focused methods.

Abstract

Last-mile delivery companies can face demand surges where large-volume order requests exceed daily courier capacity. In such cases fast and robust feasibility-first planning becomes more practical and valuable than building optimal routes. This paper proposes a hierarchical, computationally feasible decomposition pipeline that produces shift-feasible clusters under a strict shift-duration limit using travel-time-based duration estimates. While decomposition methods for large-scale VRPs are well established, they typically remain oriented toward route-construction quality within a single operational day or toward balancing customer counts, demand, or Euclidean territory partitions. In contrast, the proposed method targets a different decision problem: rapid feasibility-first strategic capacity planning for one-time extreme demand surges, where the primary requirement is to estimate, within seconds, a conservative upper bound on the number of courier shifts under a strict shift-duration limit. When end-to-end latency is evaluated from raw geographic points, including distance-matrix preparation for monolithic baselines, the proposed pipeline becomes 187 to 1315 times faster than matrix-based monolithic optimization on the common benchmark sizes. Methodologically, the contribution lies in combining (i) topology-preserving spatial linearization with a Hilbert Space-Filling Curve, (ii) adaptive greedy microclustering driven by empirical travel-time quantiles, and (iii) lexicographic dynamic-programming merge that minimizes the number of shifts first and total travel time second. This yields a planning-oriented decomposition mechanism that is distinct from classical route-quality-centered hierarchical VRP approaches.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yedilkhan et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e865126e0dea528dde9b9ehttps://doi.org/10.3390/a19040319
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Rethinking Last-Mile Routing at Scale: Near-Linear Planning on Commodity Hardware2026
  2. 2Rethinking Last-Mile Routing at Scale2026
  3. 3API-based dynamic programming model and optimization of vehicle routing: Cases of fluctuations in demand, traffic, capacity, and availability2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Development of an optimization model for dynamic multi-depot vehicle routing with capacity limits and time-dependent demands2025
  5. 5Bayesian Network-Driven Demand Prediction and Multi-Trip Two-Echelon Routing for Fleet-Constrained Metropolitan Logistics2025