PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026Sensors1 citationsOpen Access

Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks for Sensor Data Processing: A Comprehensive Survey of Architectures, Applications, and Open Challenges

View Full Paper
AMAntonio M. Martínez‐HerediaAOAndrés Ortíz

Key Points

  • The central aim is to survey the application of Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks in sensor data processing and identify current challenges.
  • Conducted a literature review from 2024 to 2026 using PRISMA methodology.
  • Examined deployment in industrial, medical, and environmental sensing applications.
  • Reviewed theoretical foundations and modern integration into deep learning architectures.
  • KANs show comparable predictive performance to conventional models with fewer parameters.
  • Challenges include computational overhead, noise sensitivity, and deployment issues in resource-constrained environments.
  • Identified limitations in scalability and the need for standardized evaluation metrics.

Abstract

Kolmogorov–Arnold Networks (KANs) have recently gained increasing attention as an alternative to conventional neural architectures, mainly because they replace fixed activation functions with learnable univariate mappings defined along network edges. This design not only increases modeling flexibility but also makes it easier to interpret how inputs are transformed within the network while maintaining parameter efficiency. KANs are particularly well suited for sensor-driven systems where transparency, robustness, and computational constraints are critical. This study provides a survey of KAN-based approaches for processing sensor data. A literature review conducted from 2024 to 2026 examined the deployment of KAN models in industrial and mechanical sensing, medical and biomedical sensing, and remote sensing and environmental monitoring, utilizing a Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-based methodology. We first revisit the theoretical foundations of KANs and their main architectural variants, including spline-based, polynomial-based, monotonic, and hybrid formulations, to structure the discussion. From a practical standpoint, we then examine how KAN modules are integrated into modern deep learning pipelines, such as convolutional, recurrent, transformer-based, graph-based, and physics-informed architectures. KAN-based models demonstrate comparable predictive performance as conventional machine learning models, while having fewer parameters and more interpretable representations. Several limitations persist, including computational overhead, sensitivity to noisy signals, and resource-constrained device deployment challenges. Real-world sensor systems encounter significant challenges in adopting KAN-based models, including scalability in large-scale sensor networks, integration with hardware architectures, automated model development, resilience to out-of-distribution conditions, and the need for standardized evaluation metrics. Collectively, these observations provide a clearer understanding of the current and potential limitations of KAN-based models, offering practical guidance on the development of interpretable and efficient learning systems for future sensor equipment applications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Martínez‐Heredia et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e8661d6e0dea528ddea895https://doi.org/10.3390/s26082515
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper