PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 2026International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery0 citationsOpen Access

Does Robotic Adrenalectomy Outperform Laparoscopic Approaches in Obese Patients? A Systematic Review and Subgroup Meta‐Analysis of 1,107 Patients

View Full Paper
AAAhmed AbdelsamadYBYoussef BadieMEMohamed Elfakharany

Key Points

  • This research investigates whether robotic adrenalectomy offers better outcomes than laparoscopic methods in obese patients.
  • Conducted a meta-analysis of studies comparing robotic and laparoscopic adrenalectomy;
  • Performed subgroup analysis based on body habitus (obese vs. non-obese) and surgical approach (LT vs. PR);
  • Evaluated study quality using Newcastle–Ottawa Scale and GRADE approach.
  • Robotic adrenalectomy significantly reduced estimated blood loss and length of hospital stay compared to laparoscopic approaches;
  • No significant differences in other outcomes such as operative time or complications;
  • Subgroup analysis indicated laparoscopic adrenalectomy had shorter hospital stays for non-obese patients.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Obesity poses technical challenges in adrenalectomy. Robotic adrenalectomy (RA) offers advantages over laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA), but evidence in obese patients remains limited. Methods A meta‐analysis of comparative studies through 2025 assessed perioperative outcomes of RA versus LA, with subgroup analyses by body habitus (obese vs. non‐obese) and surgical approach (lateral transabdominal LT vs. posterior retroperitoneal PR). Primary outcomes included operative time (OT), blood loss (EBL), hospital stay (LOHS), complications, conversion, and mortality. Study quality was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and certainty was assessed using the GRADE approach. Results Eight studies (1107 patients) were included. RA was associated with reduced EBL ( p < 0.001) and shorter LOHS ( p < 0.001), with no other significant differences. Subgroup analysis showed shorter LOHS in non‐obese LA patients ( p = 0.03). PR showed a shorter LOHS ( p = 0.001) compared with LT. Conclusions RA provides perioperative benefits, particularly reduced blood loss and shorter hospital stay, without compromising safety.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abdelsamad et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866ad6e0dea528ddeb156https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.70169
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper