PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 22, 20262 citationsOpen Access

AI Agents in Financial Markets: Architecture, Applications, and Systemic Implications

View Full Paper
HGHui Gong

Key Points

  • The study aims to explore how AI agents transform financial market decision-making and their systemic impacts.
  • Develops a four-layer architecture for financial AI agents
  • Introduces the Agentic Financial Market Model (AFMM) linking agent parameters to market outcomes
  • Presents an empirical exploration of AI-agent capabilities and market changes
  • Systemic implications of AI depend on agent architecture distribution and governance, rather than just intelligence
  • Proposes a likely operational model of AI agents as supervised partners rather than fully autonomous systems
  • Highlights a connection between agent design features and outcomes like efficiency and volatility

Abstract

Recent advances in large language models, tool-using agents, and financial machine learning are shifting financial automation from isolated prediction tasks to integrated decision systems that can perceive information, reason over objectives, and generate or execute actions. The paper develops an integrative framework for analysing agentic finance: financial market environments in which autonomous or semi-autonomous AI systems participate in information processing, decision support, monitoring, and execution workflows. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, the paper proposes a four-layer architecture of financial AI agents covering data perception, reasoning engines, strategy generation, and execution with control. Second, it introduces the Agentic Financial Market Model (AFMM), a stylised agent-based representation linking agent design parameters such as autonomy depth, heterogeneity, execution coupling, infrastructure concentration, and supervisory observability to market-level outcomes including efficiency, liquidity resilience, volatility, and systemic risk. Third, it presents an illustrative empirical application based on event studies of AI-agent capability disclosures and heterogeneous market repricing. It argues that the systemic implications of AI in finance depend less on model intelligence alone than on how agent architectures are distributed, coupled, and governed across institutions. The empirical application is intentionally exploratory: it does not validate the full AFMM but shows how one observable expectations channel can be studied using public data. In the near term, the most plausible equilibrium is bounded autonomy, in which AI agents operate as supervised co-pilots, monitoring systems, and constrained execution modules embedded within human decision processes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hui Gong (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e866c96e0dea528ddeb25dhttps://doi.org/10.3390/fintech5020034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Evolution of Financial Analysis: From Manual Methods to AI and AI Agents2025 · 10 citations
  2. 2Agentic AI systems for autonomous financial decision-making2025 · 1 citations
  3. 3Agentic AI: A Perspective on Architecture, Frameworks and Applications2026
  4. 4The Agentic Regulator: Risks for AI in Finance and a Proposed Agent-based Framework for Governance2026
  5. 5Autonomous AI agents in decentralized finance: Market dynamics, application areas, and theoretical implications2026 · 7 citations