PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 21, 2026Journal of Clinical Medicine0 citationsOpen Access

Anti-Thrombotic Therapy Following Transcatheter Structural Heart Intervention

View Full Paper
FTFrancesco TartagliaGAGiulia AntonelliAGAlessandro Gabrielli

Key Result

Antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter structural heart interventions requires individualized selection to balance device-related thrombotic risks against patient bleeding complications.

Key Points

  • To review the thrombotic risks and management strategies for antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter structural heart interventions.
  • Critical examination of thrombotic risks associated with interventions.
  • Synthesis of evidence and guidelines on antithrombotic management.
  • Discussion of ongoing clinical trials and gaps in current knowledge.
  • Found a significant risk for thrombotic events post-intervention.
  • Identified the need for tailored antithrombotic therapy based on individual patient profiles.
  • Highlighted gaps in knowledge regarding optimal therapy duration and regimen.

Structured PICO

P
Population
Patients undergoing transcatheter structural heart interventions, including aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve replacement or repair, and patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defect, and left atrial appendage closure
I
Intervention
Antithrombotic therapy

This review synthesizes current evidence and guidelines on antithrombotic management following transcatheter structural heart interventions, highlighting the need for tailored therapy balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks.

Abstract

Transcatheter structural heart interventions, including aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve replacement or repair, and patent foramen ovale, atrial septal defect, and left atrial appendage closure, have dramatically expanded over the past two decades, providing substantial improvements in both clinical outcomes and quality of life. These interventions are performed in a high-risk patient population, which is at risk for both thrombotic and bleeding complications. The introduction of prosthetic devices into the arterial or venous circulation under heterogeneous hemodynamic conditions inevitably increases the risk for thrombotic events and thromboembolic complications. Consequently, the selection of antithrombotic therapy (AT) regimen and its duration is complex and should be tailored to each patient’s risk profile, balancing the expected risk and benefits. This state-of-the-art review critically examines the thrombotic risks inherent to transcatheter structural heart interventions, synthesizes available evidence and current guidelines recommendations on antithrombotic management, and defines persisting gaps in knowledge while discussing the most relevant ongoing clinical trials.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tartaglia et al. (2026) studied this question. Antithrombotic therapy after transcatheter structural heart interventions requires individualized selection to balance device-related thrombotic risks against patient bleeding complications.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e8f1c3d6042ef4a0858283https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15083175
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper