PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026Hemodialysis International0 citations

Comparison of the Effect of Valsalva Maneuver and Rhythmic Breathing on Pain Intensity During Vascular Needle Insertion in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

View Full Paper
SSSajad SalehipourZVZeynab VoloeiSHSetayesh Hasanabadi

Key Points

  • This investigation aims to assess the analgesic effects of the Valsalva maneuver versus rhythmic breathing during needle insertion in hemodialysis patients.
  • Ninety hemodialysis patients were randomly assigned to three groups: Valsalva, rhythmic breathing, and control.
  • Rhythmic breathing involved cycles of controlled respiration prior to needle insertion, while the Valsalva group performed the maneuver immediately before insertion.
  • Pain levels were measured using a numerical pain rating scale two minutes after needle insertion.
  • Both Valsalva maneuver (3.06 ± 2.39) and rhythmic breathing (3.03 ± 2.48) groups reported significantly lower pain scores compared to the control group (6.20 ± 1.49).
  • Both interventions led to a significant reduction in pain levels compared to the control (p < 0.001).
  • No statistically significant difference was found between the efficacy of the two interventions (p = 0.99).

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Over 20% of patients undergoing hemodialysis are unable to tolerate the discomfort associated with vascular needle insertion, and nearly half (47%) report a fear of these needles, often identifying this step as the most distressing aspect of their treatment. Currently, no universally accepted method exists to alleviate this pain effectively. The objective of the present investigation was to assess and contrast the analgesic efficacy of the Valsalva maneuver and rhythmic breathing techniques in hemodialysis patients undergoing vascular access cannulation. Methods Ninety participants undergoing hemodialysis at Semnan University's Kosar Hospital were randomly divided into three study arms (rhythmic breathing, Valsalva maneuver, control) in this clinical trial, using convenience sampling for enrollment. The rhythmic breathing intervention group performed controlled, rhythmic respiration cycles (lasting 1 min every 5 min) during the 20 min preceding vascular access needle insertion. Patients assigned to the Valsalva group executed the technique for 16–20 s just prior to vascular access needle placement. Participants in the control arm received routine clinical care and no supplementary interventions. Numerical pain rating scale measurements were obtained two minutes following needle insertion to quantify pain levels. Findings Significantly lower pain scores were observed in both Valsalva maneuver (3.06 ± 2.39) and rhythmic breathing (3.03 ± 2.48) groups relative to controls (6.20 ± 1.49; p < 0.001). Subsequent analysis showed that both the Valsalva maneuver and rhythmic breathing groups experienced a markedly higher reduction in pain levels compared to the control group ( p < 0.001). However, the two interventions demonstrated comparable effectiveness, with no observable statistical difference between them ( p = 0.99). Conclusions The findings suggest that the Valsalva maneuver is equally effective as rhythmic breathing in minimizing pain during arteriovenous fistula (AV fistula) cannulation, and both methods can be recommended as non‐pharmacological pain relief strategies in hemodialysis patients. Trial Registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, Trial No: IRCT20120109008665N16. Registered 14 March 2024

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Salehipour et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b8d485696592c86ebd9bhttps://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.70066
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper