PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026American Antiquity1 citations

Communities of Practice in an Archaeological “Third Space”: Exploring Five Centuries of Plain Ware Ceramic Production along the Arizona-Sonora Borderlands

View Full Paper
HCHunter M. ClaypatchZVZithlaly VegaJSJazmin Santiago-Soto

Key Points

  • To examine plain ware ceramic production to understand the interaction and cultural practices of populations along the Arizona-Sonora border.
  • Conducted a systematic study of plain ware from 23 archaeological sites in the Upper Santa Cruz valley.
  • Applied Bhabha’s Third Space theory to analyze local potter communities and their responses to regional interactions.
  • Critically evaluated cultural boundaries to reposition the Upper Santa Cruz’s historical significance.
  • Identified plain ware as a key element in understanding local communities and cultural practices.
  • Revealed that local ceramic production was a dynamic process reflecting changing interactions over five centuries.
  • Showed that the Upper Santa Cruz region holds a rich tapestry of cultural expressions beyond traditional core/periphery models.

Abstract

Abstract Archaeologists have long interpreted Arizona and Sonora’s Upper Santa Cruz valley as a precolonial “contact zone” or “frontier” between the Trincheras and Hohokam traditions. These models are heavily influenced by the contemporary US-Mexico border and outdated core/periphery models. Furthermore, although plain ware represents most pottery from this region, it has never been used to understand the populations who inhabited the region or to reconstruct local communities of practice. This article provides the first systematic study of plain ware from 23 sites across the Upper Santa Cruz. We incorporate Bhabha’s (2004) “Third Space” theory to suggest that local potter communities actively responded to changing interactions with neighboring populations for more than five centuries. By focusing our attention on local ceramic production, and critically evaluating cultural boundaries, we reposition the Upper Santa Cruz as neither a periphery nor frontier but an area rich in its own dynamic cultural expressions and regional agency.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Claypatch et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9b9a285696592c86ec481https://doi.org/10.1017/aaq.2026.10168
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper