PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 23, 2026British Journal of Ophthalmology0 citations

Structural and vascular correlates of visual field defects in branch retinal vein occlusion: a multimodal imaging study

View Full Paper
KCKwang-Eon ChoiEYEun Gyu YoonHCHyun Woo Chung

Key Points

  • This research aims to investigate the relationship between visual field defects and retinal biomarkers in branch retinal vein occlusion.
  • Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of 85 patients with unilateral BRVO.
  • Visual fields were evaluated using Humphrey 24–2 testing, and structural parameters were obtained from OCT.
  • Perfusion metrics included vessel density in capillary plexuses and non-perfusion areas as measured by OCTA.
  • Group with significant visual field defects had a higher prevalence of major BRVO (96.3%).
  • Thinner ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer was noted in severely affected eyes compared to mildly affected ones.
  • Multivariate analysis identified BRVO type and GCIPL thickness as independent predictors of visual field loss.

Abstract

Background To evaluate the association between visual field (VF) defects and retinal structural and perfusion biomarkers in eyes with branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO), using optical coherence tomography (OCT) and OCT angiography (OCTA). Methods This retrospective cross-sectional study included 85 patients with unilateral BRVO. The eyes were classified as having either major or macular BRVO. VFs were assessed using the Humphrey 24–2 VF testing. Structural parameters were obtained from spectral-domain OCT for each parafoveal and perifoveal sublayer thickness in the superior and inferior fields. Perfusion parameters from 3×3 mm macular OCTA included vessel density (VD) in the superficial and deep capillary plexuses (DCPs), foveal avascular zone area, central non-perfusion area (NPA) and parafoveal NPA. Eyes were stratified by VF mean deviation (MD): Group 1 (significant VF defect, MD ≤−6 dB) and Group 2 (mild VF defect, MD >−6 dB). Intergroup comparisons, correlations and multivariate regression analyses were performed. Results Group 1 (n=27) had a significantly higher prevalence of major BRVO (96.3 vs 65.5%) than Group 2 (n=58). Group 1 showed thinner parafoveal ganglion cell–inner plexiform layer (GCIPL) (76.8±14.7 vs. 87.9±11.9 µm; p<0.001) and outer plexiform layer (32.5±6.6 vs. 36.1±5.5 µm; p=0.024). Hemispheric VD in the DCP was lower in Group 1 (28.9±6.2% vs. 32.7±8.1%; p=0.031). In multivariate analysis, BRVO type and parafoveal GCIPL thickness were independent predictors of significant VF loss. Conclusions VF impairment in BRVO was strongly associated with inner retinal thinning than with OCTA parameters. VF testing and structural OCT can be complemented by acuity-based assessments of BRVO.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Choi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e9baa885696592c86ecbd6https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2025-328577
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper