PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

QLQinghua LuoCHChuansheng HongCDChunyu Duan

Key Points

  • The central aim is to systematically assess the effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neuropathic pain and emotional disorders following spinal cord injury.
  • Comprehensive database search across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Pedro.
  • Inclusion of randomized controlled trials comparing rTMS to sham stimulation.
  • Outcomes measured included pain, anxiety, and depressive symptoms.
  • rTMS significantly improved neuropathic pain compared to sham stimulation (SMD = -1.41).
  • No significant changes were observed in anxiety (SMD = -0.67) or depressive symptoms (SMD = -1.04) compared to the control group.
  • Seven RCTs involving 159 SCI patients met the inclusion criteria.

Abstract

Objective The incidence of neuropathic pain following spinal cord injury (SCI-NP) is increasing, and current pharmacological treatments are often limited by severe side effects and diminishing efficacy. This study aims to systematically evaluate the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on SCI-NP and its frequently comorbid emotional disorders. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search across five databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Pedro) up to April 13, 2025. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the impact of rTMS on SCI-NP against sham stimulation were included. Pain was the primary outcome, while changes in anxiety and depressive symptoms were secondary outcomes. Data were pooled using standardized mean differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results A total of 131 studies were retrieved from the five databases, and 7 RCTs involving 159 SCI patients were ultimately included. The results indicated that, compared to the control group (sham stimulation), rTMS effectively improved SCI-NP (SMD = −1.41; 95% CI = −2.44 to −0.59; p = 0.0007, I 2 = 78%). However, rTMS did not have a significant impact on anxiety (SMD = −0.67; 95% CI = −1.82 to 0.48; p = 0.25, I 2 = 66%) or depressive symptoms (SMD = −1.04; 95% CI = −2.26 to 0.19; p = 0.1, I 2 = 74%) compared to the control group. Conclusion rTMS demonstrates promising potential in alleviating the severity of SCI-NP. However, current evidence does not support a significant therapeutic effect on comorbid emotional states. Systematic review registration https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251074707 , identifier PROSPERO (CRD420251074707).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb07a4553a5433e34b3174https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2026.1725648
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper