PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of Marine Engineering & Technology0 citationsOpen Access

Learner profiling in the maritime training: development of a short-form assessment tool

View Full Paper
FTFurkan TornacıOTOsman TuranRKRafet Kurt

Key Points

  • The aim is to create a concise assessment tool for profiling learners in maritime training to accommodate diverse backgrounds.
  • Developed a 20-item short form of the Felder-Silverman Index of Learning Styles tailored for maritime trainees.
  • Analyzed data from 155 experienced seafarers using the full 44-item ILS questionnaire and identified key questions with ANOVA F statistics.
  • Evaluated the new short form on an independent test set to assess its accuracy and predictive performance.
  • The short form achieved balanced accuracies ranging from 0.84 to 0.89 across all dimensions.
  • F1 scores indicated strong performance, ranging from 0.83 to 0.96, with the highest accuracy in the Input dimension (0.89) and best F1 score (0.96).
  • The short form reduced respondent burden while maintaining high predictive performance, facilitating efficient learner profiling.

Abstract

Maritime operations commonly involve multinational crews operating in safety-critical and time-constrained environments. Differences in professional background, training pathways, and prior learning experiences increase the need for training ap-proaches that can accommodate learner heterogeneity while remaining operationally efficient. Learner profiling plays a central role in enabling such adaptive training, but lengthy assessment instruments can increase profiling time and reduce response qual-ity, limiting their practical applicability in maritime contexts. In this study, we intro-duce a data-driven method to develop a 20-item short form of the Felder–Silverman Index of Learning Styles (ILS) tailored for maritime trainees. The responses of 155 experienced seafarers were analysed using the full 44-item ILS questionnaire, and the most descriptive five questions within each dimension were identified using ANOVA F statistics. The resulting 20-item form was evaluated on an independent test set. Across all four dimensions, the short form achieved balanced accuracies of 0.84–0.89 and F1 scores of 0.83–0.96, with the Input dimension performing best (accuracy = 0.89, F1 = 0.96). The proposed short form substantially reduces respondent bur-den while preserving predictive performance, enabling efficient learner profiling and supporting the design of adaptive maritime training.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tornacı et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb084f553a5433e34b359chttps://doi.org/10.1080/20464177.2026.2660574
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper