PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Journal of Craniofacial Surgery0 citations

Partial Ear Reconstruction Using Septal Cartilage Graft and Skin Expansion

View Full Paper
GMGiulio MarianiASAndrea SaltarelEVE Ventucci

Key Points

  • To present a case of delayed ear reconstruction using septal cartilage graft and tissue expansion methods.
  • Implantation of a tissue expander for skin coverage over weeks.
  • Reconstruction of the ear using an autologous septal cartilage graft.
  • Grafting from the inguinal groove to enhance retromedial sulcus.
  • Postoperative period was uneventful with no complications.
  • Resulting reconstruction was stable and satisfactory.
  • Demonstrated effectiveness of septal cartilage grafts and tissue expansion in ear reconstruction.

Abstract

Acquired ear deformities can arise from various causes, including trauma, burns, cancer resection, and animal bites. This article presents a case of delayed ear reconstruction in a 30-year-old Caucasian female who suffered a traumatic partial ear amputation of the middle helix due to a horse bite. The reconstruction involved a 3-step surgical procedure: implantation of a tissue expander, reconstruction using an autologous septal cartilage graft, and recreation of the retroauricular sulcus. The tissue expander was inserted through a small incision, and inflation was performed over several weeks to create adequate skin coverage. Following the expansion, septoplasty was conducted to resect the deviated septum, and the cartilage was secured and covered with the expanded skin flap. A skin graft was later harvested from the inguinal groove to enhance the retroauricular sulcus. The postoperative period was uneventful, resulting in a satisfactory and stable outcome. This case highlights the effectiveness of using septal cartilage grafts and tissue expansion as viable options for delayed partial ear reconstruction, particularly in cases where traditional methods may pose higher risks of complications.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Mariani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb092b553a5433e34b3b77https://doi.org/10.1097/scs.0000000000012797
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Complication Rate of Autologous Cartilage Microtia Reconstruction2013 · 55 citations
  2. 2Septal Cartilage Graft for Posttraumatic Ear Reconstruction2011 · 2 citations
  3. 3Reconstruction of an Acquired Subtotal Ear Defect with Autogenous Septal Cartilage Graft2007 · 8 citations
  4. 4Classification and Reconstruction of Posttraumatic Ear Deformity2012 · 26 citations
  5. 5Novel Classification of Posttraumatic Ear Deformities and its Surgical Management2020 · 5 citations