PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Applied Physics Letters0 citations

Vapor sorption-based critical dimension metrology for uniaxial anisotropic nanopatterns

View Full Paper
MFMáté FürediAMAndrás MartonJSJózsef Szenka

Key Points

  • The study aims to improve the accuracy of measuring critical dimensions in ultrathin nanopatterns.
  • Utilized ellipsometric porosimetry to measure diameters of model channel hole patterns.
  • Observed refractive index changes due to capillary evaporation to determine feature sizes.
  • Compared results with those from traditional optical critical dimension metrology.
  • EP-derived diameters showed a strong correlation with expected values.
  • EP outperformed OCD metrology in measuring features smaller than 190 nm.
  • The findings imply that EP is a viable method for complex anisotropic structures.

Abstract

A major challenge in modern semiconductor, photonic, and quantum technology is the accurate characterization of ultrathin (100 nm) patterns with ever-decreasing lateral feature sizes (25 nm). In this study, we showcase ellipsometric porosimetry (EP) as an alternative, scalable metrology for model channel hole patterns. The critical dimensions of such features are typically below 100 nm, and thus their diameters can be determined via in situ optical observation of capillary evaporation-driven refractive index changes based on classical thermodynamic principles. We demonstrate that the EP-derived diameters of the model structures correlate well with both the expected values and those obtained from optical critical dimension (OCD) metrology. Since the accuracy of OCD decreases when probing deep into the subwavelength regime (190 nm), EP emerges as a complementary metrology candidate, as its highest accuracy is typically for feature sizes of 1–25 nm. The method presented here can also be extended to more complex anisotropic structures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Füredi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb09ff553a5433e34b446dhttps://doi.org/10.1063/5.0320423
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper