PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026International Journal of Architectural Research Archnet-IJAR0 citations

Topological diagramming: a method for visualising intermediate-level knowledge

View Full Paper
SMSebastian MesserNorthumbria University

Key Points

  • The study aims to introduce a topological diagramming method to articulate insights from practice research effectively.
  • Developed and illustrated through two case studies
  • Situates the method within the context of architectural drawing and diagramming
  • Focuses on the transition from first order to second order knowledge
  • Introduces a hybrid method effective for self-reflection and thinking-through-diagramming
  • Demonstrates potential for generative use in guiding new practice outcomes
  • Suggests effectiveness in fostering collaboration among research groups

Abstract

Purpose The article proposes a method for articulating insights derived from practice research. Practice research typically produces an “intermediate level” of knowledge, that is, the “praxis space” sits between the concrete and artefactual (practice), and the abstract and predictive (theory). This builds on the work of Kristina Höök and Jonas Löwgren (2012) and Bill Gaver it commences in First Order knowledge – the tacit, embodied, and material – and proceeds towards Second Order knowledge – theorising from within the practice and across the practitioner-researcher's body of work. Practical implications The topological diagramming method is a critical, self-reflective tool, for thinking-through-diagramming, but the author proposes the diagram might then be used generatively, guiding the practitioner–researcher towards possible new practice outcomes and practice research outputs. Social implications The author proposes that this could also be an effective device for collaboration or for research groups to establish synergies. Originality/value The originality lies in developing a systematic method that arises from within the practice, and bridges between the modes of practice and the requirement to articulate a Research Narrative to explicate the characteristics inherent in practice as research.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sebastian Messer (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0ac4553a5433e34b4c5fhttps://doi.org/10.1108/arch-11-2025-0534
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Casting Call: Spatial Impressions in the Work of Rachel Whiteread2016 · 2 citations
  2. 2Architectural pedagogy for the Anthropocene: theory, critique and typological urbanism2023 · 13 citations
  3. 3Methodological research in architecture and allied disciplines2019 · 33 citations
  4. 4Architectural Research in Hybrid Mode: Combining Diverse Methods within Design-Based Architectural Research Inquiry2021 · 5 citations
  5. 5The Hybrid Practitioner2022 · 6 citations