PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2026Sustainable Energy Research1 citationsOpen Access

Data-driven modeling of solar power output using a CNN–LSTM approach

SBStephen BaniSAStephen Afonaa-MensahAYAbid Yahya

Key Points

  • The aim is to improve short-term photovoltaic power forecasts, particularly under challenging conditions.
  • Utilized a CNN–LSTM architecture to integrate temporal and long-range sequence data.
  • Evaluated with one-hour-ahead forecasting on a simulation built with PVWatts v8.
  • Reported metrics include RMSE, MAE, and R-squared to assess model performance.
  • Achieved RMSE = 0.127 kW and MAE = 0.092 kW, exceeding previous models' performance.
  • Reduced RMSE by 21.6% compared to the best CNN-only variant and by 12.4% against the best LSTM-only variant.
  • Identified optimal settings with 24-hour look-back and moderate convolutional parameters for stability.

Abstract

Short-term photovoltaic (PV) power forecasts are essential for storage dispatch, reserve scheduling, and grid safety, yet remain challenging under rapid irradiance ramps and seasonal regime shifts. We present a compact, causal CNN–LSTM architecture that couples local temporal pattern extraction with long-range sequence memory, augmented by physics-aware features (solar geometry, plane-of-array irradiance, clear-sky indices) and strict leakage safeguards. Using a one-hour-ahead task, we evaluate on a 2023 Accra, Ghana simulation study built with PVWatts v8 driven by NSRDB PSM v3. 2 (60 kWp DC, 55 kW AC). Metrics are reported in kW and normalized to DC capacity, with daylight/overall splits for fairness. The proposed model achieves RMSE = 0. 127 kW, MAE = 0. 092 kW, and R² = 0. 956 on the test split, reducing RMSE by 21. 6% vs. the best CNN-only variant and by 12. 4% vs. the best LSTM-only variant. Ablations show that engineered features and a Box–Cox target transform improve stability and accuracy; a 24 h look-back provides the best accuracy–latency balance, and moderate convolutional width (k=5, m=32) with d=128 LSTM units is near-Pareto-optimal (about 0. 093 M parameters and 2. 20 M MACs per step). Baselines (persistence, clear-sky-scaled smart persistence, and GBRT) are included to contextualize deterministic accuracy and skill. We also provide error anatomy by hour and season to highlight residual risks at dawn/dusk and during fast cloud transients. While results are strong, they reflect a simulation (plain PVWatts; no row-to-row shading or sensor noise). We outline a path to operational validation on measured plant AC data across seasons/sites and discuss extensions to probabilistic forecasting with calibrated intervals.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eb0bc7553a5433e34b54abhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s40807-026-00239-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Deep Learning Models for PV Power Forecasting: Review2024 · 70 citations
  2. 2MACHINE LEARNING APPLICATIONS IN RENEWABLE ENERGY: PREDICTIVE ANALYTICS FOR SOLAR CELL PERFORMANCE OPTIMIZATION AND ENERGY YIELD FORECASTING2025 · 8 citations
  3. 3Design of novel IoT-based solar powered PV pumping systems for agricultural applications in diverse climatic zones of India2024 · 44 citations
  4. 4Optimal sizing of a proposed stand-alone hybrid energy system in a remote region of southwest Egypt applying different meta-heuristic algorithms2024 · 41 citations
  5. 5A State-of-Art-Review on Machine-Learning Based Methods for PV2021 · 135 citations