PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation1 citations

Effects of perturbation-based gait training with and without functional electrical stimulation on reactive balance and neuromuscular coordination after stroke: a randomized controlled trial

View Full Paper
FCFelipe Covarrubias-EscuderoCMCristóbal Moënne‐LoccozTBTanvi Bhatt

Key Points

  • This research aims to evaluate the impact of perturbation-based balance training with and without functional electrical stimulation on balance and coordination in stroke survivors.
  • Randomized controlled trial with 35 ambulatory individuals post-stroke for 6 months or longer.
  • Participants were divided into groups receiving either perturbation-based balance training alone or with functional electrical stimulation.
  • Clinical performance and neuromuscular coordination were evaluated over time.
  • PBBT significantly improved mobility, gait coordination, and reactive balance stability.
  • No additional benefits from the inclusion of functional electrical stimulation were observed in group-level outcomes.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Falls during walking remain a major cause of disability after stroke. Perturbation-based balance training (PBBT) improves reactive stability, but its effects on gait-related neuromuscular coordination and the added value of functional electrical stimulation (FES) are not well established. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether PBBT, performed with or without task-synchronized FES, improves clinical performance, intermuscular coordination during gait, and reactive balance stability in individuals with chronic stroke. METHODS: In this randomized controlled trial, 35 ambulatory individuals ≥ 6 months post-stroke were allocated to PBBT alone ( RESULTS: Significant main effects of Time were observed across clinical outcomes ( CONCLUSIONS: PBBT improved mobility, gait neuromuscularcoordination, and reactive balance stability in persons with stroke. Theaddition of FES did not provide additional group-level benefit. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT06237972.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Covarrubias-Escudero et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec59fc88ba6daa22dab986https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2026.2664217
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper