PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Systems1 citationsOpen Access

How Do Carbon Markets Reshape Digital–Green Synergy in Corporate Systems?

View Full Paper
SLSiqi LiJLJun Lu

Key Points

  • This study investigates how China's carbon emissions trading pilot affects corporate digital and green transformations.
  • Adopted a systemic perspective on firm configurations as socio-technical systems.
  • Analyzed a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2024.
  • Employed an event-study difference-in-differences methodology to evaluate market response.
  • The policy intervention improved systemic synergy by 4.4% of the standard deviation of the synergy index.
  • The positive response lasted for four years before diminishing, indicating a dynamic adaptation process.
  • Factors such as financing constraints, executive compensation, and firm size negatively moderated the policy's effects.

Abstract

This study adopts a systemic perspective to investigate how China’s carbon emissions trading pilot (CCTPP) influences the internal configuration of the firm as a complex socio-technical system. We focus on the emergent property of digital–green synergy, which captures the integration between a firm’s digital and green transformation subsystems. Employing a panel dataset of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2024 and an event-study difference-in-differences methodology, we analyze the response of this system-level property to carbon market signals. The results demonstrate that policy intervention significantly enhances systemic synergy, with an effect equivalent to 4.4 percent of the standard deviation of the synergy index. The response follows a dynamic pattern, persisting for four years before gradually diminishing, thereby revealing the system’s adaptation process. Critically, the internal structure of the firm-system moderates this response, as financing constraints, executive compensation, and firm size represent key components of governance and resource-allocation subsystems and each exerts a significant negative moderating effect. Furthermore, environmental context matters, with the policy effect concentrating on firms located in central and southern regions and within non-manufacturing and non-high-tech sectors. These findings offer a system-based understanding of how carbon pricing interacts with corporate governance to facilitate integrated socio-technical transitions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5a8888ba6daa22dac212https://doi.org/10.3390/systems14050457
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper