PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2026Genome biology1 citationsOpen Access

CrossFilt: a cross-species filtering tool that eliminates alignment bias in comparative genomics studies of primates

KBKenneth BarrYGYoav Gilad

Key Points

  • The aim is to address read mapping biases in comparative genomics by developing an effective filtering tool.
  • Developed CrossFilt to filter sequencing reads based on reciprocal mapping between genomes.
  • Used real and simulated RNA-sequencing data from primates for evaluation.
  • Compared CrossFilt against five alternative filtering approaches.
  • CrossFilt outperformed all five alternative approaches in accuracy of gene expression inference.
  • The filtering tool resulted in reduced alignment bias, enhancing downstream analysis validity.
  • Differences in preprocessing choices significantly affect conclusions in comparative analyses.

Abstract

Comparative functional genomic studies are often affected by biased read mapping across species due to inter-species differences in genome structure, sequence composition, and annotation quality. We developed CrossFilt, a filtering strategy that retains only sequencing reads that map reciprocally between genomes, ensuring that quantification of read counts is based on directly comparable genomic features. Using both real and simulated RNA-sequencing data from primates, we show that CrossFilt outperforms five alternative approaches that are commonly used, resulting in more accurate inference of gene expression differences. Our results underscore how different preprocessing choices can shape downstream conclusions in cross-species functional genomics analyses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Barr et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5aa788ba6daa22dac318https://doi.org/10.1186/s13059-026-04082-2
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper