PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 20260 citationsOpen Access

METAPHYSICS OF COSMOLOGY: from epistemology to ontology: a critical–propositional analysis of Zoran Majkic's preprint in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • The aim is to analyze Zoran Majkic's transition from epistemology to ontology in cosmology and its compatibility with the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Conducted a critical–propositional analysis of Majkic's preprint.
  • Evaluated compatibilities and tensions with the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Examined philosophical implications for cosmology and quantum theory.
  • Majkic's preprint introduces valuable ontological proposals but lacks full grounding in the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Key limitations include inadequate formulation of Nothingness and infinity.
  • The work suggests new metaphysical frameworks while requiring further development on relational and cosmogonic aspects.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Zoran Majkic’s preprint Metaphysics of Cosmology: From Epistemology to Ontology in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The study examines Majkic’s effort to move from an epistemological reading of physics toward an ontological formulation centered on the distinction between the epistemic wave function and the ontological wave function, as well as on the representation of matter-density, boundary conditions, and cosmological structure. The article evaluates possible compatibilities and points of tension between Majkic’s proposal and the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity. In particular, it analyzes the preprint in light of the axioms of TO, the phenomenic elements, the Inducing Effects, the cosmogonic theorem, and the cosmological Eras of the Theory of Objectivity. Special attention is given to the questions of origin, distinction, relational observability, composition, and transcendence beyond the quantum, understood here as knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The text argues that Majkic’s preprint is philosophically relevant because it seeks to restore ontological thickness to cosmology and quantum theory, moving beyond purely statistical or instrumentalist interpretations. At the same time, the article maintains that the model remains incomplete from the standpoint of TO, since it does not fully begin from Nothingness as primitive mathematical essence, does not adequately formulate infinity as the necessary non-element, and does not fully integrate the transcendent informational-radiative dimension required by the Theory of Objectivity. Accordingly, the article proposes that Majkic’s work should be read as a valuable interlocutor in a respectful scientific debate: a fertile ontological proposal that opens important bridges toward metaphysical cosmology, yet one that still requires deeper cosmogonic, modal, and relational grounding when confronted with the Theory of Objectivity. Note by the authors: This analytical study was developed with the analytical support of ChatGPT. Keywords Theory of Objectivity; metaphysics of cosmology; ontology; epistemology; Zoran Majkic; quantum mechanics; cosmological ontology; modal discipline; phenomenic elements; Inducing Effects; cosmogonic theorem; philosophy of physics; boundary conditions; transcendence beyond the quantum; atomic radiation; information ontology; cosmological eras; critical–propositional analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ec5b0688ba6daa22dac90dhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19716800
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF COSMOLOGY: a critical–propositional analysis of ONE AXIOM: COSMOLOGY, by Robert Spychalski, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity2026
  2. 2THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF QUANTUM MECHANICS: a Critical–Propositional Reading of Foundational Quantum Bibliography in Confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity2026
  3. 3METAPHYSICS FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS E A TEORIA DA OBJETIVIDADE: uma análise crítico-propositiva da potência estruturada, da não-localidade, do colapso quântico e da transcendência informacional em confronto com os axiomas modais da TO2026
  4. 4METAPHYSICS FOR QUANTUM MECHANICS E A TEORIA DA OBJETIVIDADE: uma análise crítico-propositiva da potência estruturada, da não-localidade, do colapso quântico e da transcendência informacional em confronto com os axiomas modais da TO2026
  5. 5Dark Energy under Ontological Discipline: a critical–propositional reading of Rajesh More's review in light of the Theory of Objectivity (TO)2026