PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología1 citationsOpen Access

Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory markers in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-center retrospective study based on logistic regression and machine learning techniques

View Full Paper
XCXinying CaiXiamen UniversityDLDongqi LinSWS WangXiamen University

Key Points

  • This research evaluates the prognostic significance of preoperative inflammatory markers in NSCLC patients undergoing resection.
  • Retrospective analysis of 460 NSCLC patients and 50 for external validation from two hospitals.
  • Kaplan–Meier analysis to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).
  • Use of logistic regression and three machine learning methods (LASSO, Random Forest, SVM) for prognostic factor evaluation.
  • Optimal cut-off values for markers were NLR: 3.470, PLR: 186, SII: 853.71, SIRI: 1.66.
  • Elevated levels of all markers associated with poorer OS and PFS (3-year OS: 83.6%, 5-year OS: 72.6%).
  • SIRI showed strong discrimination as a prognostic indicator with a concordance index of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.644–0.962) in external validation.

Abstract

Purpose This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), measured 15 days prior to surgery, in patients undergoing primary resection for NSCLC. Methods We retrospectively analyzed data from 460 NSCLC patients treated at two comprehensive hospitals, along with another 50 patients for external validation. Optimal cut-off values for NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI were determined. Kaplan–Meier analysis was performed to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to identify independent prognostic factors. To evaluate and validate the reliability of prognostic factor selection, three commonly used machine learning methods—LASSO, Random Forest, and Support Vector Machine (SVM)—were applied. The systemic inflammatory markers were subjected to external validation in an independent cohort, encompassing discriminative analysis, calibration analysis, and clinical decision curve analysis (DCA), with a final evaluation of the SIRI’s underlying rationale. Results The optimal cut-off values for NLR, PLR, SII, and SIRI were 3.470, 186, 853.71, and 1.66, respectively. Kaplan–Meier curves demonstrated that elevated levels of all four markers were significantly associated with poorer OS and PFS. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 83.6 and 72.6%, while the 3- and 5-year PFS rates were 82.4 and 75.0%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified several factors significantly associated with survival, including inflammatory markers, smoking, antibacterial use, lymphatic metastasis, radiotherapy, intraoperative blood loss, and preoperative albumin levels. Multivariate analysis further revealed that lymphatic metastasis, antibacterial use, NLR, and SIRI were independent predictors of OS, whereas lymphatic metastasis, radiotherapy, antibacterial use, NLR, and SIRI were independently associated with PFS. Consistently, machine learning methods also highlighted NLR and SIRI as reliable independent prognostic indicators in patients with resectable NSCLC. SIRI showed good discrimination with a concordance index of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.644–0.962) for external validation. Conclusion Preoperative systemic inflammatory markers, particularly SIRI, are strong and independent prognostic indicators of PFS in patients with resectable NSCLC. Among these, a low SIRI may provide superior risk stratification for identifying high-risk patients and informing individualized treatment strategies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edaafc4a46254e215b32f7https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2026.1771545
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper