PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Materials0 citationsOpen Access

Probabilistic Aseismic Performance Assessment of Rubber–Sand–Concrete Tunnel Linings Considering Spatial Variability of Rock Mass

View Full Paper
KLKaichen LiXMXiancheng MeiBLBaiyi Li

Key Points

  • The study aims to develop a probabilistic framework to assess the aseismic performance of tunnel linings considering spatial variability in rock mass.
  • Developed a probabilistic framework using random field theory.
  • Evaluated aseismic performance across varying peak ground acceleration (PGA) levels and tunnel depths.
  • Compared results with traditional deterministic methods.
  • Reduced dispersion of maximum principal stresses by approximately 70% across various PGAs.
  • Aseismic performance of RSC decreases with greater burial depths, but remains substantial.
  • Lowered failure probability from 31.8% to 16.3% at PGA = 1.2 g.

Abstract

In tunnel engineering, the integration of aseismic materials and structural designs has become a prevalent strategy to reduce earthquake-induced damage. However, previous studies on the seismic performance of tunnel structures predominantly employed deterministic methods, overlooking the spatial variability of the surrounding rock mass. This oversight often leads to an overestimation of structural performance, posing potential risks to the project. This study develops a probabilistic framework based on random field theory to evaluate the aseismic performance of tunnel linings incorporating a rubber–sand–concrete (RSC) constrained damping layer. The analysis systematically evaluates the aseismic performance of RSC across varying peak ground acceleration (PGA) levels and tunnel depth conditions. The findings are compared with results from traditional deterministic approaches. The probabilistic analysis indicates the following: (1) a reduction of approximately 70% in the dispersion of maximum principal stresses across various PGAs; (2) a decrease in RSC’s aseismic performance with greater burial depths, though it remains substantial overall, and (3) a reduction in the failure probability from 31.8% to 16.3% at PGA = 1.2 g. Furthermore, deterministic methods tend to produce overly optimistic estimates of tunnel aseismic performance, highlighting the need for probabilistic analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac2e4a46254e215b3e62https://doi.org/10.3390/ma19091741
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper