PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Periodontology 20002 citationsOpen Access

Marginal bone loss around implants – What does it mean?

View Full Paper
CDCarlotta DionigiKBKostas BougasTBTord Berglundh

Key Points

  • This review aims to summarize current evidence regarding changes in marginal bone levels around dental implants.
  • Conducted a narrative review based on selected literature including clinical trials and observational studies.
  • Prioritized studies involving population-based datasets and radiographically assessed MBL changes.
  • Evaluated temporal patterns and methods of assessment for clinical implications.
  • Most marginal bone loss occurs in the early phases after implant installation, typically not exceeding 1 mm.
  • After prosthetic loading, further MBL changes are usually minor, ranging between 0.1 mm to 0.3 mm in the first year.
  • Approximately 15–25% of implants experience bone loss exceeding 1 mm, with fewer instances showing significant loss.

Abstract

Abstract Background Changes in peri‐implant marginal bone levels (MBL) constitute a central outcome in studies on implant therapy and reflect the integrity of the supporting tissues over time. Aim To summarize current evidence on MBL changes around dental implants, with emphasis on temporal patterns, methods of assessment and their clinical interpretation. Materials and Methods This narrative review is based on a targeted screening of the literature, including pre‐clinical investigations, observational studies and clinical trials reporting radiographically assessed MBL changes. Population‐based datasets and randomized controlled trials were prioritized. Results The available evidence indicates that most MBL change occurs during the early phases following implant installation and abutment connection and typically does not exceed 1 mm, reflecting physiological remodeling. After prosthetic loading, further MBL alterations are generally also limited, commonly within a range of 0.1–0.3 mm during the first year of function and minimal changes thereafter. Radiographic methods are most frequently used for MBL assessment, with reported measurement errors in the order of ≤0.5 mm. While mean MBL changes are small in most studies, analyses of distributions show that approximately 15–25% of implants present with bone loss exceeding 1 mm, whereas only a smaller proportion exhibits pronounced bone loss. Conclusions MBL changes over time are limited at the majority of dental implants. These alterations represent the cumulative effects of biological, mechanical and host‐related factors. The interpretation of MBL changes should consider methodological aspects of assessment and reporting, as well as their relationship to peri‐implant diseases. Progressive bone loss constitutes a defining feature of peri‐implantitis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dionigi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edac2e4a46254e215b3f1chttps://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70036
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper