PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Digital studies in language and literature3 citationsOpen Access

Abstracted Identity: An Exploratory Corpus Analysis of AI’s Impact on Authorial Identity in Academic Writing

THTimothy HampsonUniversity of Stirling

Key Points

  • This research explores the impact of generative AI on how authors express their identity in academic abstracts.
  • Generated two corpora from abstracts of academic articles in linguistics, covering different years (2018–2019 and 2023–2024).
  • Employed a descriptive non-inferential corpus design to compare ngram frequency between pre- and post-AI corpora.
  • Analyzed shifts in words and phrases related to authorial stance.
  • Identified a small shift away from traditional authorial stance in abstracts written post-AI.
  • Observed changes in ngram frequency indicating decreased expressions of personal authorial identity.

Abstract

Abstract Generative artificial intelligence is increasingly being used for academic writing. However, this is potentially a cause of concern if this is having an impact on how authors express themselves. In this study, I generate two corpora from the abstracts of academic articles in the ‘languages and linguistics’ field, one spanning 2018–2019 and another 2023–2024. To analyse these, I take a descriptive non-inferential corpus design to compare ngram frequency in the pre- and post-AI corpora to identify shifts in words and phrases related to authorial stance. I conclude by arguing that there is a possibility that generative AI is already influencing how abstracts are written, with a small shift away from authorial stance.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Timothy Hampson (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edacdb4a46254e215b4949https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2026-0012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Is Stack Overflow Obsolete? An Empirical Study of the Characteristics of ChatGPT Answers to Stack Overflow Questions2024 · 94 citations
  2. 2On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots2021 · 6,467 citations
  3. 3A systematic examination of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) use guidelines in applied linguistics journals2025 · 13 citations
  4. 4More human than human? Differences in lexis and collocation within academic essays produced by ChatGPT-3.5 and human L2 writers2025 · 19 citations
  5. 5Making AI Less 'Thirsty'2025 · 143 citations