PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 2026Journal of Affective Disorders0 citationsOpen Access

Dynamic associations between emotion regulation, mental fatigue, and stress: An ecological momentary assessment study

View Full Paper
RKRebecca KirkhamEAEugene AidmanMYMurat Yücel

Key Points

  • This study aims to explore the connections between emotion regulation strategies, mental fatigue, and stress at the individual level.
  • Ecological momentary assessment with surveys administered every 3 hours over 28 days.
  • 179 adults aged 18-35 completed a total of 10,984 surveys.
  • Examined bidirectional relationships between emotion regulation, mental fatigue, and stress.
  • Distraction as an ER strategy frequently predicted increases in both mental fatigue and stress.
  • No ER strategies were linked to decreased stress after 3 hours.
  • Increased mental fatigue and stress led to more frequent use of distraction.

Abstract

The use of emotion regulation (ER) strategies, including distraction or reappraisal, is influenced by dynamic factors such as mental fatigue and stress. Mental fatigue arises from cognitive effort, including the exertion required for effortful ER, and accumulates with repeated effort. Stress also influences ER by altering emotion intensity and goals. While ER strategies are essential for self-regulation, some may increase mental fatigue and stress, heightening the risk of emotional extremes or dysregulation that may adversely impact daily life. However, the bidirectional associations between ER strategies and mental fatigue and stress remain unclear. This study examined these relationships at the within-person level using ecological momentary assessment (EMA), with surveys administered approximately 3 h apart. Specifically, this study investigated whether (1) ER strategy selection predicts mental fatigue and stress, (2) mental fatigue and stress predict ER strategy selection, and (3) the number of ER strategies implemented predicts mental fatigue. Between March and July 2024, 179 adults (74% women), aged 18–35, completed up to four EMA surveys daily over 28 days (total surveys = 10,984), reporting momentary ER strategy use, mental fatigue, and stress. Results revealed that distraction as an ER strategy was frequently used and bidirectionally predicted increases in both mental fatigue and stress, suggesting potential maladaptive effects for some people. While stress was associated with increased use of most ER strategies, no ER strategies were associated with decreased stress 3 h later. These findings highlight that considering strategy selection and timing may mitigate maladaptive ER and enhance well-being. • Distraction was frequently used, and predicted more mental fatigue and stress • Mental fatigue and stress increased the likelihood of using distraction • Use of multiple strategies did not predict subsequent mental fatigue • Stress predicted greater use of all emotion regulation strategies except relaxing

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kirkham et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edad8f4a46254e215b52dfhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2026.121855
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper