PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Microbial Analysis of Flood Water in Amassoma Community, Bayelsa State

View Full Paper
AGAyebapreye Harry GijoGOGift Egbefumere OgeleECEmeka Samuel Chibuike

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess the microbial quality of flood water in the Amassoma community.
  • Triplicate samples collected from four stations in Amassoma community.
  • Used randomized block experimental design for sampling.
  • Analyzed microbial counts and identified species through biochemical testing.
  • High levels of total coliforms observed, with E. coli and Salmonella spp. present.
  • Mean counts ranged from 37.67±2.76 CFU/ml (Station 4) to 52.67±1.56 CFU/100ml (Station 2).
  • Presence of various pathogens, including Shigella sp. and Bacillus sp., indicates significant fecal contamination.

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This study investigates the microbial quality of flood water in Amassoma community, Bayelsa State, Nigeria, in September, 2024. This study presents a microbial analysis of floodwater samples collected from four stations (1–4). A randomized block experimental design was used. Triplicate samples were taken from each location. The results revealed high levels of total coliforms, Escherichia coli, Salmonella spp., and Vibrio spp., indicating significant fecal contamination and potential health risks. Fungal species such as Aspergillus sp. and Candida sp. were also isolated. The microbial counts varied notably across sampling sites, with values ranging ranged from 38.23±1.12 CFU/ml (Station 4- control) to 44.63±1.28 CFU/ml (Station 2) in mean values. The highest mean count in sampling station 2 (52.67± 1.56 CFU/100ml) indicates potential contamination. Again, sampling station 4 (control) had the lowest mean coliform levels (37.67± 2.76), suggesting more stable and cleaner conditions. The distribution of bacterial species across different sampling locations reveals spatial variability in microbial presence. Notably, Bacillus sp. was consistently present across all stations. Escherichia coli was also frequently encountered in all the sampling stations. The presence of Shigella sp., Providencia sp., and Pragia sp. further supports the possibility of contamination with enteric pathogens. The biochemical test results provided valuable confirmation of bacterial identities. Shigella sp. was characterized as a Gram-negative rod, catalase and indole positive, but negative for citrate and gas production. These results highlight the importance of targeted microbial monitoring in flood-prone areas to assess public health risks and guide sanitation responses.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gijo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69edadd94a46254e215b56dfhttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19734253
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Bacterial Pathogen Community Profiling of Three Freshwater Bodies in Akwa North and South Local Government Areas, Anambra State, Nigeria2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Microbial Water Quality: An Assessment from Delta State University Campuses, Abraka2024
  3. 3Microbiological assessment of the quality of domestic water consumed in Southern Edo State, Nigeria2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Bacteria and fungi isolates associated with harvested fish from Useh flood reservoir in Edo State2024
  5. 5Bacteriological assessment of sediments from catfish ponds in Monai, Southern Basin of Kainji Lake, New Bussa, Niger State, Nigeria.2024 · 1 citations