Sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrated delayed neointimal coverage and slower thrombus disappearance compared to bare metal stents at 6 months post-implantation.
Do sirolimus-eluting stents delay neointimal coverage and thrombus disappearance compared to bare metal stents at 6 months?
Sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrate delayed healing and slower thrombus resolution compared to bare metal stents at 6 months, highlighting potential mechanisms for late stent thrombosis.
AIMS: The neointimal coverage and intracoronary thrombi within stented segments at 6 months after implantation between sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) and bare metal stents (BMSs) were compared by direct visualization using angioscopy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty-six patients (36 stable angina and 10 acute coronary syndrome) were treated with 33 SESs and 33 BMSs. Immediately after and 6 months after stenting, each of the stented segments, edge body, and overlapping segment were observed by angioscopy and the grade of neointimal coverage over the stents was classified as 0: absent neointima, 1: visible struts through thin neointima, or 2: invisible struts. The existence of thrombi was also evaluated. The average grade of the neointimal coverage at 6 months follow-up was lower in the SES than that in the BMS (edge: 1.4+/-0.7 vs. 1.9+/-0.2, body: 1.0+/-0.5 vs. 1.8+/-0.5, overlapping segment: 0.6+/-0.7 vs. 1.8+/-0.5; P<0.0001, P<0.0001, P=0.0069, respectively). The frequency of persistence of thrombus was significantly higher in the SESs than that in the BMSs (86 vs. 29%, respectively; P=0.031). CONCLUSION: The present study suggested a delayed neointimal stent coverage and slower thrombus disappearance process in the SESs in comparison to the BMSs.
Makoto Takano (2006) studied this question. Sirolimus-eluting stents demonstrated delayed neointimal coverage and slower thrombus disappearance compared to bare metal stents at 6 months post-implantation.