PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology0 citationsOpen Access

Efficacy and safety of extended-release dinalbuphine sebacate in a multimodal analgesic regimen following cesarean section: A prospective observational study

View Full Paper
PHPo-Hsun HouSCSun-Mei ChungJHJei-Yu Huang

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of dinalbuphine sebacate for pain control following cesarean sections.
  • Prospective observational study design with 65 participants; 33 in control (morphine) group, 32 in dinalbuphine group.
  • Intervention included a single 150 mg dinalbuphine dose and patient-controlled analgesia morphine.
  • Participants assessed pain intensity every 4 hours post-op day one and twice daily days 2-4.
  • Pain intensity over four days was not significantly different between groups (p = 0.238).
  • Control group used more rescue propacetamol, with significance (p < 0.001).
  • No participants reported persistent pain at three months, and adverse events were comparable between groups.

Abstract

Persistent pain is a frequent outcome following cesarean section, with reported incidence ranging from 6.9% to 30.7% at three months after surgery. Developing novel analgesics with long duration of action, high potency, and a low risk of abuse is crucial. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of dinalbuphine sebacate, a slow-release, long-duration nalbuphine, as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen for post-cesarean section pain control. In this prospective observational study, participants received either a conventional patient-controlled analgesia regimen with morphine delivered for three days or an adjusted regimen consisting of a single 150 mg dose of dinalbuphine followed by one day of patient-controlled analgesia morphine. Mefenamic acid administered four times daily and supplementary propacetamol were provided in both groups. Participants rated postoperative pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable) every 4 h on postoperative day one and twice daily on days 2–4, and the area under the curve of pain over time was compared between groups. In total, 33 participants in the control group and 32 in the dinalbuphine sebacate group completed all assessments. Pain intensity over four days did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.238); however, the control group had a significantly higher frequency and total consumption of rescue propacetamol (both p < 0.001). No participant reported persistent pain at three months after surgery, and the incidences of adverse events were comparable between groups. Furthermore, no adverse events were observed in neonates fed with breast milk. Dinalbuphine sebacate is safe and effective for post-cesarean pain management when integrated into multimodal analgesic regimens. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05009771.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefcf4fede9185760d3b72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2026.02.003
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Breast Milk Excretion of Dinalbuphine Sebacate Injection Administered After Cesarean Section2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Pharmacokinetics of dinalbuphine sebacate and nalbuphine in human after intramuscular injection of dinalbuphine sebacate in an extended‐release formulation2017 · 29 citations
  3. 3Guidelines for Perioperative Care in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) Society Recommendations: 20182018 · 2,122 citations
  4. 4Excretion of Ketoprofen and Nalbuphine in Human Milk During Treatment of Maternal Pain After Delivery2007 · 41 citations
  5. 5Accuracy of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for screening to detect major depression among pregnant and postpartum women: systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data2020 · 907 citations