PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Computer Graphics Forum0 citationsOpen Access

Self‐supervised Learning of Fine‐to‐Coarse Cuboid Shape Abstraction

View Full Paper
GKGregor KobsikMHMorten HenkelYHYan‐Lin He

Key Points

  • This research aims to improve the abstraction of 3D shapes using a self-supervised learning approach that minimizes the number of geometric primitives.
  • Introduced a fine-to-coarse self-supervised learning architecture for 3D shapes.
  • Implemented abstraction and reconstruction loss formulations to reduce redundancies and maintain shape fidelity.
  • Evaluated performance on benchmark collections of man-made and humanoid shapes.
  • Achieved significant reduction in the number of cuboid primitives while enhancing shape representation accuracy.
  • Demonstrated improved performance compared to previous cuboid-based shape abstraction techniques.
  • Successful application of cuboid abstraction in tasks like clustering, retrieval, and partial symmetry detection.

Abstract

Abstract The abstraction of 3D objects with simple geometric primitives like cuboids allows us to infer structural information from complex geometry. It is important for 3D shape understanding, structural analysis and geometric modeling. We introduce a novel fine‐to‐coarse self‐supervised learning approach to abstract collections of 3D shapes. Our architectural design allows us to reduce the number of primitives from hundreds (fine reconstruction) to only a few (coarse abstraction) during training. This allows our network to optimize the reconstruction error and adhere to a user‐specified number of primitives per shape while simultaneously learning a consistent structure across the whole collection of data. We achieve this through our abstraction loss formulation which increasingly penalizes redundant primitives. Furthermore, we introduce a reconstruction loss formulation to account not only for surface approximation but also volume preservation. Combining both contributions allows us to represent 3D shapes more precisely with fewer cuboid primitives than previous work. We evaluate our method on collections of man‐made and humanoid shapes comparing with previous state‐of‐the‐art learning methods on commonly used benchmarks. Our results confirm an improvement over previous cuboid‐based shape abstraction techniques. Furthermore, we demonstrate our cuboid abstraction in downstream tasks like clustering, retrieval, and partial symmetry detection.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kobsik et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd82fede9185760d4258https://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.70344
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Dynamic FAUST: Registering Human Bodies in Motion2017 · 372 citations
  2. 2DAE-Net: Deforming Auto-Encoder for fine-grained shape co-segmentation2024 · 9 citations
  3. 3A scalable active framework for region annotation in 3D shape collections2016 · 1,313 citations
  4. 4Structure-aware shape processing2014 · 55 citations
  5. 5Approximate convex decomposition2004 · 46 citations