PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction0 citations

Development of Inspection Checklists in Accordance With NTP 324 for Work Activities Inside Trenches

View Full Paper
JBJorge BucheliMCMauricio CelyEBErika Bonilla

Key Points

  • The aim is to develop checklist questionnaires based on NTP 324 to enhance safety management in excavation works.
  • Development of checklists in line with Technical Prevention Note NTP 324.
  • Integration of checklists into local operational and regulatory frameworks.
  • Identification of unsafe conditions to prioritize risk management.
  • Prioritization of critical areas for risk detection based on deficiency levels identified.
  • Enhanced estimation of risk levels using evaluation method from NTP 330.
  • Framework promotes the implementation of technical criteria for excavation safety.

Abstract

In the construction sector, various types of excavations can be distinguished, each associated with specific objectives and particular construction techniques. Depending on the scale of the project and ground conditions, these activities may lead to catastrophic and even fatal accidents, mainly related to cave-ins, collapses, and landslides. Excavation works interact directly with their geotechnical environment, which in many cases reveals the absence of systematic tools for verifying on-site safety conditions. Within this context, the development of checklist questionnaires based on Technical Prevention Note NTP 324, integrated into a local operational and regulatory framework, represents a significant contribution to excavation safety management, both for professional practice and the academic community. The identification of unsafe conditions or deficiencies makes it possible to prioritize critical areas and to transform risk detection into concrete preventive actions. As a result, the determination of deficiency levels is consolidated as a key tool for active safety management, subsequently enabling the estimation of risk levels in accordance with the evaluation method established in NTP 330. This approach justifies the application of technical criteria defined in the current technical-legal regulations and promotes their future implementation as a practical tool for construction projects involving excavation works.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bucheli et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd82fede9185760d4375https://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2026.13(1).csa-09
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A CHECKLIST DEFINITION FOR ASSESSING MECHANICAL RISKS USING NTP 330 IN A REPAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION PROCESS2024
  2. 2DEVELOPMENT OF NTP 324-BASED CHECKLIST QUESTIONNAIRES FOR OCCUPATIONAL RISK PREVENTION IN STEEL STRUCTURE WELDING PROCESSES2026
  3. 3METHODOLOGICAL GUIDE FOR JOB SAFETY ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS BASED ON NTP 3302026
  4. 4Identifying Causes of Accidents And Enhancing Safety Using the Fishbone Method: an Application in Excavation2024
  5. 5Development and Short-Term Evaluation of a Pretask Safety Briefing Tool for Highway Construction and Maintenance Crews2026