PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Proceedings of International Structural Engineering and Construction0 citations

From Building to Development: Reconfiguring Spatial Production

View Full Paper
JAJuan Diego AcurioECEnrique Ferreras Cid

Key Points

  • The research aims to develop a methodological framework for understanding and improving spatial production in Nayón.
  • Utilized a dialectical method to analyze spatial production across multiple scales: metropolitan, sectorial, and architectural.
  • Employed an 'event network' analytical tool to identify variables interacting with social needs and structural constraints.
  • Mapped core contradictions like center/periphery and formal/informal to explore patterns of exclusion.
  • Developed context-sensitive spatial strategies advocating for inclusivity and sustainability.
  • Highlighted the capacity of architecture as a political and developmental instrument to counteract spatial commodification.
  • Demonstrated the potential for architecture to address structural inequalities through thoughtful design processes.

Abstract

This study proposes a methodological framework for spatial production based on dialectical materialism, applying it to the case of Nayón, a rural parish within Quito’s Metropolitan District. It seeks to confront the contradictions inherent in the dominant capital-oriented mode of construction through a multi-scalar analysis metropolitan, sectorial, and architectural. By employing the dialectical method, the research articulates “theses” territorial conditions, “antitheses” critical alternatives, and “syntheses” context-sensitive spatial strategies to guide more inclusive, adaptable, and sustainable architectural interventions. The “event network” is used as an analytical tool to identify variables where spatial design can mediate between social needs and structural constraints. Core contradictions center/periphery, tradition/modernity, formal/informal, and public/private are mapped to highlight patterns of socio-spatial exclusion. The study proposes a methodology that enables architecture to act as a political and developmental instrument. It advocates for spatial strategies that respond to local dynamics, encourage collective life, and resist spatial commodification. This approach reframes architecture not as an object-focused practice, but as a process capable of addressing structural inequalities through spatial design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Acurio et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefd82fede9185760d442dhttps://doi.org/10.14455/isec.2026.13(1).pnd-04
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper