PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 27, 2026Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology0 citations

Rock Collapse to Debris Slide Transition: Understanding the Dynamics and Hazard Implication

View Full Paper
MBMuhammad BilalXXXueyong XuHZHaoshan Zhang

Key Points

  • This research aims to analyze the dynamics of rock collapse transitioning to debris slides and their implications for hazard assessment.
  • Reconstruction of the December 3, 2004 Zuojiaying landslide using field investigations and UAV-based digital elevation models.
  • RAMMS simulations to assess the impact of erosion-entrainment on landslide mobility and deposit characteristics.
  • Sensitivity study focusing on variations in erodible material density and saturation in the transport zone.
  • Landslide volume increased from 11,000 m³ to approximately 36,000 m³ due to entrainment effects.
  • Runout distance increased from approximately 380 m to 430 m with maximum deposit thickness rising from about 4 m to 7 m.
  • Findings highlight the critical role of erosion-entrainment in determining landslide mobility and deposit features.

Abstract

Mining-induced landslides in southwestern China are being more frequently reported, but quantifying the erosion-entrainment effect on their mobility requires further attention. This study reconstructs the December 3, 2004, Zuojiaying landslide in Guizhou, China, where a rainfall- and mining-triggered rock collapse evolved into a debris slide that claimed 44 lives. Field investigation and UAV-based digital elevation model are combined with RAMMS simulations to reproduce the landslide's dynamic characteristics and assess the effect of entrainment on runout. Back-calculated models suggest that the landslide volume increased from an initial 11,000 m³ to approximately 36,000 m³ due to entrainment. A sensitivity study shows that denser and more saturated erodible material in the transport zone substantially increases entrained volume. Comparison of scenarios with and without entrainment reveals that runout extends from ∼380 m to ∼430 m, with maximum deposit thickness increasing from ∼4 m to ∼7 m. A stage-wise analysis of the runout process emphasizes the critical role of erosion-entrainment in regulating mobility and the deposit characteristics of landslides, which includes four stages from rock collapse to debris slide. These findings provide quantitative constraints on substrate erodibility and entrainment that govern runout and deposit thickness, improving hazard assessment and zoning in areas with similar conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bilal et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69eefdd1fede9185760d496ehttps://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2025-138
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper