PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 1, 1975Circulation461 citationsOpen Access

Predictive implications of stress testing. Follow-up of 2700 subjects after maximum treadmill stress testing.

View Full Paper
MEMyrvin EllestadUniversity of Southern CaliforniaMWMaolin WanYale University

Key Points

  • The aim was to evaluate the predictive implications of maximum treadmill stress testing on coronary events.
  • Follow-up of 2700 subjects post maximum treadmill stress testing using life tables for analysis.
  • Assessment of ST-segment depression during tests and its correlation to coronary event incidence.
  • Evaluation of the effects of ischemia onset timing and prior myocardial infarction on event rates.
  • Positive stress tests showed a 9.5% yearly incidence of coronary events, compared to 1.7% in negatives.
  • Early ischemia onset (4 METS) led to a 15% yearly incidence of all coronary events.
  • Prior myocardial infarction doubled the incidence of events in positive responders versus those without.

Abstract

Follow-up data on 2700 subjects who had had maximum stress tests were assembled in life tables. A positive test, characterized by ST-segment depression of 1.5 mm, 0.08 sec from the J point, predicted an incidence of some new coronary event of 9.5% a year, as compared with 1.7% in those with a negative test. The incidence of infarction and death was also significantly higher than in the negative responders. Early onset of ischemia occurring at moderate exercise (4 metabolic equivalents-METS) resulted in an incidence of all coronary events of 15% a year, while ischemia first manifested at the seventh minute of exercise (approximately 8 METS) results in an incidence of only 4% per year. The magnitude of ST depression and the age of onset of ischemia failed to influence the incidence of coronary events. A myocardial infarction previous to the test increased the incidence of events in both positive and negative responders. The positives with a previous infarction had more than double the incidence of coronary events than the positive responders with no pre-existing infarction. Those with chronotropic incompetence had a high incidence of coronary events even though the ECG response to exercise was normal.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ellestad et al. (1975) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69effa92bce9831ba4f73be9https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.51.2.363
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper