PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026Cellulose1 citationsOpen Access

Counterion condensation, ion pairing and scattering properties of carboxymethyl cellulose with mono- and di-valent ions

EGElmira Abbasi GharehTapehTWTakaichi WatanabeFHFerenc Horkay

Key Points

  • To investigate the interaction between carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and monovalent/divalent counterions in aqueous media.
  • Studied scattering and conductivity properties under varying ion conditions.
  • Compared properties of magnesium and sodium salts of carboxymethyl cellulose.
  • Evaluated counterion condensation using multiple methods like potentiometry and viscosity.
  • Scattering patterns for Mg salts show a broad shoulder, indicating weaker electrostatic repulsion between CMC chains.
  • Effective charge of MgCMC is approximately half that of NaCMC (suggesting weaker charge density).
  • Ion pairing varies significantly among alkali metal counterions, impacting overall conductivity.

Abstract

Abstract We study the scattering and conductometric properties of a semiflexible polyelectrolyte, carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), with monovalent and divalent counterions in aqueous media without added salts. The scattering patterns for the magnesium salts of CMC display a broad shoulder instead of the scattering peak observed for the monovalent salts. This suggests weaker electrostatic repulsion between chains and a consequent loss of local order. The result is consistent with conductivity measurements, which reveal that the effective charge of the backbone for MgCMC is approximately half that of NaCMC. The decrease in charge density agrees with Oosawa–Manning condensation, which expects the charge density to be inversely proportional to the counterion valence. Alkali metal counterions show large differences in ion-pair formation but only a weak effect in counterion condensation. We suggest that paired ions are a subset of condensed ions. A review of different methods to evaluate counterion condensation, including potentiometry, osmometry and viscosity-based methods is presented. Qualitative agreement between these methods is found and possible reasons for the discrepancies are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

GharehTapeh et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04e08727298f751e7216ehttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-026-07021-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper