PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 2026School Science and Mathematics0 citations

Model‐Based Inquiry: Designing for Opportunities to Learn

View Full Paper
YBYue BaiTCTodd CampbellRGRon E. Gray

Key Points

  • The aim is to assess how model-based inquiry (MBI) influences students' opportunities to learn (OTL) in science education.
  • Quasi-experimental design employed using the next generation science classrooms questionnaire.
  • Examined participation across four strands of scientific proficiency: understanding explanations, generating evidence, reflecting knowledge, and productive participation.
  • Compared MBI units with non-MBI units to evaluate differences in OTL.
  • MBI significantly enhances students' OTL, particularly in generating scientific evidence (effect size not specified) and reflecting on scientific knowledge (effect size not specified).
  • Findings support MBI as a promising framework for encouraging students' engagement in scientific practices.
  • Results underline the need for robust measures of OTL to develop equity-focused science curricula.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Students' opportunity to learn (OTL) is a central theme in recent discussions of educational equity. Building on prior research, we argue that students' effective participation in scientific practices serves as a key indicator for measuring OTL and that model‐based inquiry (MBI) offers an instructional framework to support such participation in K‐12 science classrooms. However, most studies exploring students' experiences with scientific practices rely heavily on qualitative methods, and the lack of robust measures for students' OTL constrains efforts to address educational equity issues. Accordingly, we employed a quasi‐experimental design using the next generation science classrooms questionnaire to examine students' opportunities to engage in scientific practices across MBI and non‐MBI units. The questionnaire captures students' participation across four strands: understanding scientific explanations, generating scientific evidence, reflecting on scientific knowledge, and participating productively in science. The research question is: “To what extent do MBI units offer students an OTL across four strands of science proficiency?” Results indicate that MBI significantly enhances students' OTL, particularly in generating scientific evidence and reflecting on scientific knowledge. These findings demonstrate MBI's potential in promoting students' participation in scientific practices and offer both a framework for equity‐focused curriculum design and an empirical approach for measuring OTL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Bai et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04e5b727298f751e72426https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.70028
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper