PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 28, 20260 citationsOpen Access

THEORY OF EVERYTHING AND THE MODAL DISCIPLINE OF OBJECTIVITY: a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally's equation TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity

View Full Paper
VCVidamor CabannasDSDenivaldo Silva

Key Points

  • This analysis aims to explore the relationship between Peerally’s Theory of Everything and the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Conducted a critical-propositional analysis of Peerally’s equation TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE.
  • Evaluated Peerally’s theories against the modal discipline of the Theory of Objectivity.
  • Identified points of compatibility and tension between the two theoretical frameworks.
  • Identified significant compatibility in critiquing reductionism and emphasizing consciousness.
  • Highlighted tensions regarding idealism and the role of consciousness without formal modal structure.
  • Concluded that Peerally's equation offers dialogical potential with a score of 7.5/10.

Abstract

This article presents a critical–propositional analysis of Abed Peerally’s Theory of Everything (TOE) = Philosophy of Everything (PHIOE) + Physics of Everything (PHYOE): Toward Its Elucidation, in confrontation with the Theory of Objectivity (TO). The analyzed work proposes that a genuine Theory of Everything cannot be reduced to physics alone, but must integrate a Philosophy of Everything and a Physics of Everything. From the perspective of the Theory of Objectivity, this study examines Peerally’s proposal through the modal discipline of TO, especially its Seven Absolute Truths, phenomenic elements, Inductive Effects, cosmogonic theorem, cosmological Eras, and the thesis that the transcendent element is knowledge or information produced in atomic relations and equivalent to atomic radiations. The article identifies significant points of compatibility between Peerally’s project and TO, especially the critique of physical-mechanistic reductionism, the centrality of the origin of the universe, the relevance of consciousness, and the need to overcome a purely mechanical conception of reality. At the same time, it highlights points of tension, particularly regarding the possible tendency toward idealism, theological metaphysics, or the attribution of foundational status to consciousness without modal formalization. The analysis argues that Peerally’s equation — TOE = PHIOE + PHYOE — can be fruitfully reinterpreted within the Theory of Objectivity as the need for a modal ontology of totality, articulated through phenomenic physics and informational transcendence. The article concludes that Peerally’s work has strong dialogical potential with TO, receiving a dialogical score of 7.5/10. Authors’ note: This analytical text received analytical support from ChatGPT. Keywords: Theory of Everything; Philosophy of Everything; Physics of Everything; Abed Peerally; Theory of Objectivity; TO; modal ontology; modal discipline; phenomenic elements; Inductive Effects; origin of the universe; consciousness; observer; creation from nothing; transcendent information; atomic radiation; cosmology; philosophy of physics; critical–propositional analysis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Cabannas et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f04edc727298f751e72d24https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19794674
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper