PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2014SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología65 citationsOpen Access

New SPECT and PET Radiopharmaceuticals for Imaging Cardiovascular Disease

OSOyebola O. SogbeinMPMatthieu Pelletier‐GalarneauTSThomas H. Schindler

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Nuclear cardiology has experienced exponential growth within the past four decades with converging capacity to diagnose and influence management of a variety of cardiovascular diseases. Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) with technetium-99m radiotracers or thallium-201 has dominated the field; however new hardware and software designs that optimize image quality with reduced radiation exposure are fuelling a resurgence of interest at the preclinical and clinical levels to expand beyond MPI. Other imaging modalities including positron emission tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) continue to emerge as powerful players with an expanded capacity to diagnose a variety of cardiac conditions. At the forefront of this resurgence is the development of novel target vectors based on an enhanced understanding of the underlying pathophysiological process in the subcellular domain. Molecular imaging with novel radiopharmaceuticals engineered to target a specific subcellular process has the capacity to improve diagnostic accuracy and deliver enhanced prognostic information to alter management. This paper, while not comprehensive, will review the recent advancements in radiotracer development for SPECT and PET MPI, autonomic dysfunction, apoptosis, atherosclerotic plaques, metabolism, and viability. The relevant radiochemistry and preclinical and clinical development in addition to molecular imaging with emerging modalities such as cardiac MRI and PET-MR will be discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sogbein et al. (2014) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69f14b372811130d0cde20adhttps://doi.org/10.1155/2014/942960
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Comparison of Cost-Effectiveness and Utility of Exercise ECG, Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography, Positron Emission Tomography, and Coronary Angiography for Diagnosis of Coronary Artery Disease1995 · 199 citations
  2. 2Inhibitors of NADH–ubiquinone reductase: an overview1998 · 531 citations
  3. 3Synthesis and characterization of 123I-CMICE-013: A potential SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging agent2013 · 18 citations
  4. 4Hybrid PET/MR Imaging of the Heart: Potential, Initial Experiences, and Future Prospects2013 · 166 citations
  5. 5Phase I, First-in-Human Study of BMS747158, a Novel 18F-Labeled Tracer for Myocardial Perfusion PET: Dosimetry, Biodistribution, Safety, and Imaging Characteristics After a Single Injection at Rest2011 · 134 citations